Shettleworth, S. J. Evolution, Cognition and the Study of Behavior(Oxford University Press Oxford 2010).
Zentall, T. R. & Wasserman, E. A. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Cognition(Oxford University Press Oxford, 2012).
Madden, J. R., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., Beardsworth, C. E. & van Horik, J. O. The quick are dead: Pheasants are more likely to survive in the wild if they are unable to reverse a learned association. Philos. T. R. Soc. T. R. Soc. 373, 20170297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0297 (2018).
Morand-Ferron J. Cole E. F. and Quinn J. L. Examining the evolutionary ecology cognition in the wild: a review addressing both practical and conceptual problems. Biol. Revs. 91, 367389. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12174 (2016).
Byrne, R. & Whiten, A. Machiavellian intelligence: social competence and the evolution in intellect in monkeys and apes (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
Dunbar R. I. M., & Shultz S. Evolution of the social brain. Science 317, 13441347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145463 (2007).
Parker, S. T. & Gibson K. R. Object manipulation, tool use, and sensorimotor Intelligence as feeding adaptations for cebus monkeys. J. Hum. Evol. 6, 623641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(77)80135-8 (1977).
Milton, K. Foraging behaviours and the evolution primate intelligence. In Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution in intellect in monkeys, humans and apes (eds Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A.) 285305 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
Rosati A. G. Foraging cognition. Reviving the ecological intelligence hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 691702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011 (2017).
Sol, D.; Sayol F.; Ducatez S.; & Lefebvre L. A life-history basis for behavioural innovations. Philos. T. R. Soc. T. R. Soc. 371, 20150187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0187 (2016).
Boogert, N. J., Madden, J. R., Morand-Ferron, J. & Thornton, A. Understanding and measuring individual differences in cognition. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170280. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0280 (2018).
Griffin, A. S. Guillette L. M. & Healy S. D. Personality and cognition: An analysis of an emerging field. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 207214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012 (2015).
R. Dukas (2004) Evolutionary biology of animal cognition. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 35, 347374. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130152 (2004).
Guenther, A. Guenther, A. Anim. Behav. 130, 119131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.06.011 (2017).
Guillette, L. M., Hahn, A. H., Hoeschele, M., Przyslupski, A.-M. & Sturdy, C. B. Individual differences in learning speed and performance accuracy, as well as exploratory behaviour, are all present in black-capped chickadees. Anim. Cogn. 18, 165178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0787-3 (2015).
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B. Tomasello M. Humans are capable of social cognition. This is the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317, 13601366. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146282 (2007).
Cauchoix, M. et al.Meta-analysis of cognitive performance repeatability: Philos. T. R. Soc. T. R. Soc. 373, 20170281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0281 (2018).
Dougherty L. R. & Guillette L.M. Linking personality & cognition: a metaanalysis. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170282. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0282 (2018).
Keagy J., Minter R. & Tinghitella R. M. Sexual differences in cognition and their relation to male mate selection. Curr. Zool. 65, 285293. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz014 (2019).
Lucon-Xiccato, T. & Bisazza, A. There are differences in spatial abilities between male and female guppy. Anim. Behav. 123, 5360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.026 (2017).
Guillette L. M., Naguib M. & Griffin A. S. Individual differences of cognition and personality Behav. Process. 134, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.001 (2017).
Sih, A. Sih, A. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 367, 27622772. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216 (2012).
Carere, C. & Locurto C. Interaction of animal personality and animal cognition. Curr. Zool. 57, 491498. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.4.491 (2011).
Weiss, A. A look at personality traits from the animal kingdom. J. Personal. 86, 1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12310 (2018).
Rale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. Integrating animal temperament into ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev. 82, 291318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x (2007).
Sih A., Bell A. M.., Johnson J. C., & Ziemba R.E. Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 241277. https://doi.org/10.1086/422893 (2004).
McCrae R. R. & John O. P. Introduction to the Five-Factor Model. J. Personal. 60(2), 175215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x (1992).
Carter, A. J. Feeney W. E. Marshall H. H. Marshall Cowlishaw G. Heinsohn R. Animal personality. What are behavioural ecologists measuring? Biol. Rev. 88, 465475. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12007 (2013).
Koski, S. E. Towards a wider range of animal personality research. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00070 (2014).
Wilson, V., Guenther A., verli., Seltmann M. W. & Altschul D. Future directions in personality research: Providing new insights into animal behavior. Animals 9, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050240 (2019).
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B. Cheney, D. L. Variation of personality and fitness in wild female Baboons P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1698016985. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210780109 (2012).
Seltmann M. W. Helle S., Htut W. & Lahdenper M. Males in semi-captive Asian Elephants are more aggressive and less social than their female counterparts. Sci. Rep. 9, 2668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39915-7 (2019).
Webster, M. M. & Ward A. J. W. Personality & social context. Biol. Rev. 86, 759773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x (2011).
Krause, J. James, R. and Croft D. P. Personality within the context of social networking. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 40994106. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0216 (2010).
Verspeek, J., Staes, N., van Leeuwen, E. J. C., Eens, M. & Stevens, J. M. G. Bonobo personality predicts friendship. Sci. Rep. 9, 19245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55884-3 (2019).
Ebenau, A., von Borell, C., Penke, L., Ostner, J. & Schlke, O. Personality homophily and male social bonding in wild Assamese Macaques. Macaca assamensis. Anim. Behav. 155, 2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.05.020 (2019).
Massen, J. J. M., & Koski S. E. Chimps in a feather sit together: Chimpanzee friendships rely on homophily of personality. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.008 (2014).
Seyfarth, R. M., Silk, J. B. Cheney, D. L. Social bonds in female Baboons: The interaction of personality, kinship, and rank. Anim. Behav. 87, 2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.008 (2014).
Planas Sitj, I. Deneubourg, J.L. Gibon, C. and Sempo, G. Group personality in collective decision-making: A multilevel approach. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 282, 20142515. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2515 (2015).
Koski, S. E. & Burkart J. M. Common marmosets exhibit social plasticity and group-level similarity of personality. Sci. Rep. 5, 8878. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08878 (2015).
V. lipogor. Gunhold de Oliveira T. Tadi Z. Massen J. J. M. & Bugnyar T. Consistent intra-individual differences in common marsets (Callithrix jacchus) in Boldness-Shyness, Stress-Activity, and Exploration-Avoidance. Am. J. Primatol. 78, 961973. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22566 (2016).
lipogor, V., Massen, J. J. M., Schiel, N., Souto, A. Bugnyar T. Temporal consistency, ecological validity and personality structure in common marsets (Callithrix jacchus): a unifying field and laboratory approach. Am. J. Primatol. 83, 23229. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23229 (2021).
De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg H. C. Personality, learning and education: a review. Eur. J. Personal. 10, 303336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5%3c303::AID-PER262%3e3.0.CO;2-2 (1996).
Poropat, A. E. A meta analysis of the five-factor model for personality and academic performance Psychol. Bull. 135, 322338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996 (2009).
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R. & Avdic, A. The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, & academic achievement. Personal. Individ. Differ. 51, 472477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019 (2011).
Mazza, V. & Guenther, A. City mice and country mice: Innovative problem solving in urban and rural noncommensal rodents Anim. Behav. 172, 197210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.12.007 (2021).
Range, F., Bugnyar T., Schlgl C. & Kotrschal K. Individual and sex differences among ravens’ learning abilities. Behav. Process. 73, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.04.002 (2006).
Matzel, L. D. et al.Individual differences in the expression and expression of general learning abilities in mice. J. Neurosc. 23, 64236433. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-16-06423.2003 (2003).
Mazza, V., Jacob, J., Dammhahn, M., Zaccaroni, M. & Eccard, J. A. Individual differences in cognitive style reflect foraging and antipredator strategies in small mammals. Sci. Rep. 9, 10157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46582-1 (2019).
Altschul, D. M., Wallace, E. K., Sonnweber, R., Tomonaga, M. & Weiss, A. Intelligence of Chimpanzees: Performance, personality, and motivation using touchscreen tasks. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 19. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170169 (2017).
Amy, M. van Oers K. & Naguib M. Worms undercover: Relationships between learning tasks performance and personality in great suits (Parus major). Anim. Cogn. 15, 763770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0500-3 (2012).
Boogert N.J., Reader S. M. & Laland K. N. The relation of social rank, individual learning and neophobia in starlings. Anim. Behav. 72, 12291239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.021 (2006).
Guillette, L. M., Reddon, A. R., Hoeschele, M. & Sturdy, C. B. Sometimes slow is better: Slow-exploring birds are more sensitive than others to vocal discrimination changes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 278, 767773. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1669 (2011).
Mazza, V., Eccard, J. A., Zaccaroni, M., Jacob, J. Dammhahn M., Zaccaroni, M., Jacob J. Anim. Behav. 137, 119132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.01.011 (2018).
Carazo, P., Noble, D. W. A., Chandrasoma, D. & Whiting, M. J. Individual differences in spatial learning in a Lizard are explained by sex and boldness. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 281, 20133275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3275 (2014).
Huebner F., Fichtel C., & Kappeler P. M. Linking cognition and fitness in a wild primate. Fitness correlates with problem-solving performance as well as spatial learning ability. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0295 (2018).
Nawroth C.; Prentice P. M. and McElligott A. G. Individual personalities in goats predict their performance at visual learning tasks and non-associative cognitive ones. Behav. Behave. 134, 4353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.08.001 (2017).
Rowe, C., & Healy S. D. Measuring variation within cognition. Behav. Ecol. 25, 12871292. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru090 (2014).
Dammhahn, M., Mazza, V., Schirmer, A., Gttsche, C. & Eccard, J. A. Of city and village mice. Behavioral adjustments of striped field mice to urban environments. Sci. Rep. 10, 13056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69998-6 (2020).
Mazza, V., Dammhahn, M., Lsche, E. & Eccard, J. A. 2020 Small mammals in big cities: behavioural adaptations of non-commensal rodents for urban environments. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 63266337. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15304 (2020).
Chow, P. K. Y. Clayton N. S. & Steele. M.A. Cognitive performance of wild Eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) in rural and urban, native and non-native environments. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.615899 (2021).
Chow, P. K.Y. & Uchida K. von Bayern, A. M. und Koizumi I. Characteristics urban environments and novel problem solving performance in Eurasian Red squirrels. Proc. Roy. Soc. Soc. 288, 20202832. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2832 (2021).
Boucherie P. H.; Loretto M.C.; Massen J. J. M. and Bugnyar T. What are social complexity & social intelligence in birds? Lessons from ravens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2607-2 (2019).
Wascher, C.A. F., Kulahci I. G. Langley E. J. G. and Shaw R. C. How does cognition influence social relationships? Philos. T. R. Soc. T. R. Soc. 373, 20170293. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0293 (2018).
Seyfarth R. M. & Cheney D.L. Social cognition. Anim. Behav. 103, 191202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.030 (2015).
S. Dalesman Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 373, 20170291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0291 (2018).
Burkart J. M. & van Schaik C. P. Revisiting and evaluating the effects of cooperative breeding. J. Zool. 299, 7783. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12322 (2016).
Horn, L. et al.The effects of colonial nesting and cooperative breeding on prosociality in corvids are gender-specific. Elife 9, 58139. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58139 (2020).
Horn, L. Scheer, C. Bugnyar T. & Massen J. J.M. Proactive sociality in a cooperatively-breeding corvid, The azurewinged magpie (Cyanopica cyana). Biol. Let. 12, 20160649. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0649 (2016).
Gunhold, T., Whiten, A. T. & Bugnyar T. Video demonstrations of seed alternative problem-solving methods in wild common marmosets. Biol. Let. 10, 20140439. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0439 (2014).
Thornton, A. & Samson, J. Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats. Anim. Behav. 83, 14591468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.018 (2012).
Smit, J. A. H. & van Oers K. Personality types differ in how they use personal and social data. Anim. Behav. 151, 185193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.02.002 (2019).
Aplin, L. M. & Morand-Ferron, J. Stable producerscrounger dynamics among wild birds: sociability, learning speed covary and scrounging behaviour. Proc. Roy. Soc. Soc. 284, 20162872. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2872 (2017).
Garber, P. A. et al.Common marmosets exhibit trait stability and trait variation (Callithrix jacchus) inhabiting ecologically distinct habitats in northeastern Brazil. Am. J. Primatol. 81, e23018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23018 (2019).
Malukiewicz, J. et al.A brief introduction to Callithrix and a review of recent advances in marmoset research. ILAR J 61(23), 110138. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilab027 (2020).
de Oliveira Terceiro, F. E. et al.Higher social tolerance in wild than captive common marmosets: The role interdependence plays. Sci. Rep. 11, 825. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80632-3 (2021).
Marmoset, A. W. Tamar and Goldizen: Unusual flexibility Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 3640. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90045-6 (1988).
Day, R. L. Coe R. L. Kendal J. R. and Laland K. N. Neophilia innovation and social-learning: A study of intergeneric variations in callitrichid monkeys Anim. Behav. 65(3), 559571. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2074 (2003).
Schiel, N. & Souto, A. A brief overview of the common marmoset’s natural history, ecology, and behavior. Dev. Neurobiol. 77, 244262. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22458 (2017).
Gunhold, T., Massen, J. J. M., Schiel, N., Souto, A. T. & Bugnyar T. Memory, transmission, and persistence of alternative foraging methods in wild common marmosets. Anim. Behav. 91, 7991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.023 (2014).
Gunhold, T. Range F., Huber L., & Bugnyar T. Long term fidelity of foraging methods in common marmosetsCallithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatol. 77, 264270. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22342 (2015).
Schiel, N. & Huber L. Social influences on foraging behavior in free-living common marsets (Callithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatol. 68, 11501160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20284 (2006).
Snowdon, C. T. Social process in communication and cognition of callitrichid monkeys: A review. Anim. Cogn. 4, 247257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710100094 (2001).
T. Bugnyar & L. Huber. Pushing or pulling: An experimental study of imitation in marmosets. Anim. Behav. 54, 817831. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0497 (1997).
Voelkl, B. Huber, L. A true imitation in marmosets. Anim. Behav. 60, 195202. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1457 (2000).
Burkart, J. M., Strasser, A. & Foglia M. Trade-offs in social learning and individual innovation in common marmosetsCallithrix jacchus. Anim. Behav. 77, 12911301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.006 (2009).
Tomassetti, D. et al.Personality and lateralization in common marsets (Callithrix jacchus). Behav. Process. 167, 103899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103899 (2019).
Masilkova M. and Weiss A., lipogor V & Konen M. Comparative evaluation of behaviorally derived personality patterns in golden-handed Tamaras (Saguinus midas), cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus Oedipus), and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). J. Comp. Psychol. 134, 453466. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000226 (2020).
V. lipogor, Burkart J. M. Martin J. S. Martin, T. Bugnyar & S. E. Koski Validation of the Personality Method in Common MarmosetsCallithrix jacchus): getting the best of both worlds. J. Comp. Psychol. 134, 5270. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000188 (2020).
Martin, J. S. et al.The EGA+GNM framework is an integrative approach to modeling behavioural syndromes. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 245257. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13100 (2019).
A. Weiss, C., Yokoyama C., Hayashi T. & Inoue Murayama M. 2021 Personality, subjective wellbeing, and the serotonin receptor gene in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). PLoS ONE 16(8), 0238663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238663 (2021).
Inoue-Murayama, M., Yokoyama, C., Yamanashi, Y. & Weiss, A. Common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) personality, subjective well-being, hair cortisol level and AVPR1a, OPRM1, and DAT genotypes. Sci. Rep. 8, 10255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28112-7 (2018).
Koski, S. E. et al.Common marmosetCallithrix jacchus) personality. J. Comp. Psychol. 131, 326336. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000089 (2017).
Iwanicki, S. and Lehmann J. Behavioral, trait, and personality assessments in common marmosetsCallithrix jacchus). J. Comp. Psychol. 129, 205217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039318 (2015).
Majolo, B., Buchanan-Smith, H. M. & Bell, J. Common marmoset’s response to new objects and foraging tasks (Callithrix jacchus) female pairs. Lab Anim. 32, 3238. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0303-32 (2003).
du Sert, N. P. et al.The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines to report animal research. PloS Biol 18, e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 (2020).
Coleman, K., Tully, L. A. McMillan J. L. Temperament and training success in adult rhesus Macaques Am. J. Primatol. 65, 6371. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20097 (2005).
Pter, A. Solomon Coder version beta 17.03.22: A simple and easy solution to behavior coding https://solomon.andraspeter.com/ (2017).
beda, Y., Ortn, S., St Leger, J., Llorente, M. & Almunia, J. Personality in captive killer Whales (Orcinus orca): a rating approach based on the five-factor model. J. Comp. Psychol. 133, 252261. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000146 (2019).
Morton, F. B. Morton, F. B. Anim. Behav. 149, 8995. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2019.01.003 (2019).
Zientek, L. R. & Thompson, B. Applying the bootstrap in the multivariate case: Bootstrap component/factor analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2), 318325. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193163 (2007).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson D. R. Multimodel analysis: Understanding AIC & BIC in model selection. Sociol. Method Res. 33, 261304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 (2004).
Takemoto, A. et al.Individual differences in visual discrimination and reverse learning performance in common marmosets. Neurosci. Res. 93, 136143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.001 (2015).
Munger, E. L., Takemoto, A., Raghanti, M. A. K. & Nakamura K. Visual discrimination in aged common marmosets: Reversal learning (Callithrix jacchus). Neurosci. Res. 124, 5762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2017.06.002 (2017).
R. T. Bartus & R. L. Dean & D. L. Fleming: Aging in a rhesus monkey. Effects on visual discrimination and reversal learning. J. Gerontol. 34, 209219. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/34.2.209 (1979).
Languille, S. et al.Grey mouse lemur: A non-human primate model for aging studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 11, 150162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.07.001 (2012).
Moore, T. L.; Killiany R. J.; Herndon J. G.; Rosene D. L. & Moss M. B. Impairment of abstraction and set shifting in older Rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol. Aging 24, 125134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00054-4 (2003).
Sadoun, A. Rosito M., Fonta C. & Girard P. Key periods in cognitive decline in a nonhuman primate cognitive aging model, the common marmosetCallithrix jacchus). Neurobiol. Aging 74, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.10.003 (2019).
Brucks D., Marshall-Pescini S., Wallis L. J. and Huber L. & Range F. Dogs’ inhibitory control abilities are not related across tasks. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0084 (2017).
Bond, A. B., Kamil A. C. & Balda R. P. Serial learning and the evolution in behavioral flexibility in three species North American corvidsGymnorhinus, cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica). J. Comp. Psychol. 121, 372379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.372 (2007).
Tebbich, S., Sterelny, K. & Teschke, I. The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation, behavioural flexibility and the tale of the finch. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 10991109. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0291 (2010).
LaClair, M. & Lacreuse, A. Reversal Learning in gonadectomized marmosets, with and without hormone replacement: Are males more tolerant to punishment? Anim. Cogn. 19, 619630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0966-5 (2016).
Schubiger, M. N., Wstholz, F. L., Wunder, A. Burkart, J. M. Experimenters’ emotional reactions to Schubiger, Wunder, A., and Wstholz, F. L., affect participation in cognitive tests using common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim. Cogn. 18, 701712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0837-5 (2015).
Yamamoto M. E., Domeniconi C. & Box H. Sex differences among common marmosetsCallithrix jacchus) in response to an unfamiliar food task. Primates 45, 249254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-004-0088-6 (2004).
Griffin, A. S., & Guez D. 2014 Innovations and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms Behav. Process. 109, 121134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027 (2014).
Cote, J., Clobert, J., Brodin, T., Fogarty, S. & Sih, A. Personality-dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philos. T. R. Soc. B. 365, 40654076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0176 (2010).
Taborsky, B. & Oliveira R. F. Sociable competence: An evolutionary approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 679688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.09.003 (2012).
