[ad_1]
By ALEX HARRIS, Miami Herald
MIAMI (AP) — Despite years of warnings from top scientists around the world, Florida’s plan to address climate change only involves spending money to adapt to rising seas instead of cutting the emissions that cause them. The state actually passed bills that oppose these goals.
“You can’t do one without the other. It can be counterproductive to do one without the next. It’s a job incomplete,” said Jonathan Webber, deputy director of environmental advocacy group Florida Conservation Voters.
A recent exchange between two state representatives over the future of Florida’s latest Chief Resilience Officer, the person in charge of the state’s response to climate change, underscores the dissonance.
Moments before the unanimous passage last week of a bill that would create an office and staff for the state’s resilience officer, Rep. Ben Diamond, a Democrat representing St. Petersburg, suggested an amendment that would also ask the CRO to research the best methods to reduce emissions in the state.
Political Cartoons
If the world doesn’t stop emitting greenhouse gasses quickly, the planet could lose its chance to keep global warming to a manageable level, which could be devastating for the Sunshine State’s economy and environment, climate experts say.
“Unless we’re charging our CRO with developing some policies about how we’re going to turn the tide back on these problems, we are not fully tackling this issue head-on,” he said.
The bill’s sponsor, Miami-Dade area Republican Rep. Demi Busatta Cabrera, shot down Diamond’s amendment.
“It doesn’t resolve real issues and I refuse to politicize this issue. Floridians don’t care about us scoring political points. They don’t care about what words we use, they care about action. They care about real results, and that’s what the bill does. And this amendment would hinder that,” she said.
The bill passed without the amendment, but with Diamond’s vote. According to the Miami Herald, he was not surprised by the outcome. He’s suggested bills for years that would create a climate task force to examine the impact of climate change on the state, and other Democrats have pushed for bills that would force the state to stop burning fossil fuels and switch to renewable energy. None of them have been heard by a single committee.
“The reason why I’m so frustrated is this issue is so much more serious than adapting to flooding,” he said. “We can’t adapt our way out of climate change.”
FLOOD PROTECTION VS ‘LEFT-WING STUFF’
The last time Florida’s Legislature addressed the root cause of climate change — greenhouse gas emissions — it was in a law that effectively blocked cities from cutting emissions.
Florida passed a law that was written last year by natural gas companies. It prohibits cities from banning natural gas use. This is part of a national movement to reduce carbon emissions. Natural gas, which provides about 70% of the state’s fuel at power plants and is also used in some homes for heating and cooking, is made of methane gas, which heats the atmosphere much more than carbon dioxide does.
The new law undercut cities’ ability to meet the goals they set to get to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, a goal named by the United Nations to avoid the worst impacts of global warming.
Despite Florida’s indifference to climate change mitigation, the state recently committed hundreds of millions to help local governments pay for the critical upgrades that they need to withstand rising tides.
Florida spent $670 million in the last months on federal and state money for cities to build roads, floodproof buildings, and transform polluted septic tanks into sewer lines.
None of the money is used for projects that promote renewable energy, building efficiency, or other methods to reduce emissions. Gov. Ron DeSantis, in a press conference announcing the first wave of state funding, dismissed such policies as “left-wing stuff.”
“What I’ve found is when people start talking about things like global warming they typically use that as a pretext to do a bunch of left-wing things that they would want to do anyways,” he said.
At the second press conference, when a Miami Herald reporter asked DeSantis about the state’s plans to address greenhouses gasses, he did not answer. Instead, he spoke about how hurricanes have been a problem in Florida for years.
“We’re not going to be able to stop being vulnerable,” he said. “We’re going to mitigate what Mother Nature is throwing at us.”
THREE CHIEF RESSILIENCE OFFICERS IN TROIS YEARS
The governor’s office did not respond to requests for comment about how the state is tackling climate change or make the current chief resilience officer, Wesley Brooks, a former staffer of Sen. Marco Rubio, available for an interview. Brooks has not been interviewed by any media outlet since November, when he was appointed.
DeSantis named Florida’s first chief resilience officer, Julia Nesheiwat, when he first took office. In the six months she was there, Nesheiwat produced a report that outlined a need for more state funding for local drainage projects, but didn’t mention emissions.
The position was taken over by the head of the Department of Environmental Protection after Nesheiwat’s departure in 2020. Brooks was then named in November.
“The CRO position is emblematic of the governor’s thinking on this issue. He’s not taking it totally seriously,” Webber said. “It’s a half-baked idea, to begin with. The Legislature is now trying to flesh it out and leaving out the most important part of resiliency.”
Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not been published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
