Now Reading
Government Climate Crisis Response: Delay, Deny, and Do Nothing| Government Climate Crisis Response: Deny, Delay, and Do Nothing

Government Climate Crisis Response: Delay, Deny, and Do Nothing| Government Climate Crisis Response: Deny, Delay, and Do Nothing

Opinion | Government Climate Crisis Response: Deny, Delay, and Do Nothing

It was more than a century ago that the TwistThe Climate Change Shuffle, once a global craze for dance halls, is now a global craze for government halls and conference centers. Officials dance around the shuffling in government halls. dangersClimate change.

The Climate Change Shuffle starts with a simple maneuver: deny the existence of climate change. Put your feet flat on the floor and dismiss any scientific consensus about climate change or global warming. Negate that climate change is a threat for humanity and the health of our planet (Table 1).

Source: Author’s composition.

The second step in Climate Change Shuffle, which has a high popularity and is easy to do, is the delay. While gently moving your body from left to right, stress that economic growth, advanced technologies and human ingenuity are the real solutions to environmental problems. All of these will require some time and resources. Lean forward and propose the creation of technical commissions to produce long reports. Do not delay.

Until governments are fully committed and take the necessary actions to combat climate change, which is unlikely anytime soon, government officials will continue to perform the Climate Change Shuffle.

The Climate Change Shuffle’s third and final step is to do nothing. This should be done effortlessly without any movement. Do nothing, just remain still and don’t move forward. Let the time pass slowly as you can. Climate change will likely be forgotten soon, replaced by something more immediate like gas prices, a scandal with sex, or a military invasion.

Scientific evidence mounting, including the Sixth Assessment ReportThe International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicates that global warming has a greater impact on the world than it was several years ago. Despite this, governments, particularly those that emit greenhouse gases, continue to dance the Climate Change Shuffle.

Two-thirds (or more) of the world’s total CO2 emissions come from the top ten global emitters of greenhouse gases. China, which accounts for 30 percent of the world’s CO2 emissions, is far and away the most important. The United States is second with 14 percent, followed closely by India (7 percent) and Russia (5 percent) (Figure 1).

Source: Statista.

Environmental Scientists, naturalists and concerned citizens, young activistsGlobally, scientists have warned that climate change caused by humans is causing widespread destruction in nature. This is affecting billions of people’s lives and prompting them to call for action. The most affected by climate change are likely to be the ecosystems and the populations that are least capable of coping.

Also, there are thousands of ScientistsGovernments have been warned that the future of planet earth’s habitability depends on taking immediate, large-scale actions in at least six critical and interrelated areas. These areas: Energy, short-lived pollutants. Nature, food, economy, population.

They recommend limiting fossil fuel burning, restoring ecosystems and moving to plant-based diets. DegrowthStabilizing the world population.

However, the majority of the suggested actions are not appealing to governments or their constituents. For example, it is considered difficult to switch from burning fossil fuels into renewable energy. Global greenhouse gas emissions come from a variety of sources, including energy, industry, waste, and agriculture. three-quartersFrom energy consumption

To meet the growing global demand for electricity, alternatives to fossil fuels are not available. About 70% of the world’s electricity comes from fossil fuels. two-thirdsGlobal electricity generation is a combination of natural gas, oil, and coal contributing 38, 28, and 3 percent respectively, while renewables contribute 9 percent.

Some ProgressionRecent changes in diets have made it possible to switch from meat to plant-based foods. However, curtailing consumption, or shrinkingThe economy is unlikely to be accepted by most people anytime soon.

Many governments and businesses consider attempts to stabilize the population to be a violation of their laws. They consider population growth essential for economic growth and political power as well as national identity. Accordingly, the world’s population is projected to increase from 8 to 10 billion today to around 10 billion by mid-century.

When confronted with the overwhelming evidence of climate changes, governments that have a major effect on global warming glide to a delay step. As witnessed at It was disappointingMany countries are not prepared to make concrete commitments on necessary actions and timetables at the Glasgow Climate Change Summit (COP26) last November.

The demand for electricity is a major reason many governments do the Climate Change Shuffle. This is because they rely on coal-fired power stations in order to meet this rising demand. The top four countries responsible, namely China, India and the United States, were responsible. 76 percentFigure 2: The world’s coal-fired electricity for 2020 (Figure 2).

Source: EMBER.

With its 1,110China had 53 percent of the world’s coal-fired electricity, and these power stations provided 61% of China’s electricity. India is second, but at a much lower level, accounting for 14 percent of the global coal-fired electricity. Its coal-fired power plants provide 71% of India’s electricity.

The United States and Japan are third and fourth respectively, accounting for 11 percent and 9 percent of the world’s global coal-fired electricity in 2020. However, Japan and the United States have significantly smaller contributions to their domestic electricity consumption than India and China. They contribute 19 and 29 percent respectively.

Another reason that some governments continue to do their Shuffle is because climate changes have become a highly partisan issue. Because climate change has become a contentious topic, political paralysis has made it difficult for elected governments to pass the legislation and implement the necessary actions to address the issue.

See Also
JUST Egg Launches Campaign Calling Out Congressmen for Denying Climate Change

For example, in the United States, 139 RepresentativesIn the 117th Congress, they continue to deny the scientific consensus that climate change is human-caused. In the United States, Democratic and Republican voters are very different in their views on climate change.

Whereas 78 percent21% of Republicans and 11% of Democrats agreed that climate change should be a top priority for 2020. The gap between them has grown over the years with increasing numbers of Democrats saying that climate change should be a top priority (Figure 3)

Source: Pew Research Center.

Faced with overwhelming scientific evidence regarding climate change and the inability to take necessary actions, some funds, observers, and organizations have intensified their efforts to push governments to adopt climate change policies.

Others, however, include many. StudentsMany are extremely worried about the future, and have been influenced by empty promises made by politicians for years.

They point out that in Kyoto, Japan, 25 years ago, when the world population was almost 6 billion, leaders from government met and agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Seven years ago, with the world population at more than 7bn, governments adopted the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degree Celsius. Today, with the world population at 8 Billion and an expected rise to 9 Billion in 15 years, very few countries are meeting their obligations.

Others have also become fatalistic about global heating as they see a rapidly closing window for securing a livable future while governments dance the Climate Change Shuffle. Additional Studies in scienceThey feel that they will make no difference in the near certain outcomes. They believe that governments will not be in a position to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. Many have concluded that governments will not be able to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees.

Regardless of whether you are optimistic, pessimistic or fatalistic about climate change and the response of governments to it, there are three conclusions that seem reasonable.

First, the widely reported scientific evidence, findings, and published reports on human-induced temperature change and its far reaching effects worldwide, are clear, unambiguous and indisputable.

Second, the effects of climate change will continue to affect countries. These include severe disruptions to the natural environment of the planet and severe adverse effects on human population.

Third, until governments are fully dedicated to taking the necessary actions to combat climate change, which doesn’t appear likely anytime soon, government officials continue to dance the Climate Change Shuffle (i.e., denial, delay, and then do nothing).

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.