Now Reading
How to Survive Climate Change – Following the Dire IPCC Report

How to Survive Climate Change – Following the Dire IPCC Report

How to Survive Climate Change Effects Following Dire IPCC Report

“Delay means death.” This is the message from the United Nations’ most recent report on climate change. According toThe UN’s secretary-general. The report of 3,700 pages is intended to be a wakeup call, driving home the severity and importance of the climate crisis. It is also a reminder that this decade will be crucial for the transition away from fossil fuels.

Even though developed countries are working to reduce greenhouse gas emission, they must also prepare for the climate damage that human activities have already caused. The UN report It was found that global warming has led to a significant increase in severe weather events like hurricanes, droughts and wildfires. Meanwhile, long-term phenomena such as sea-level rise, extreme heat, and other climate-related phenomena have made some parts of the world uninhabitable. Even if the world stopped releasing carbon dioxide tomorrow, it is already too late to stop these extraordinary transformations.

There are, however, plenty of things the US — and the world — can do to soften the blow. The UN report, which combines decades of research on climate change adaptation, proposes hundreds solutions that can reduce the human cost and financial impact of disasters like hurricanes or extreme heat. These interventions could make the future more bearable, and they are possible if our governments commit to them. Patrick Verkooijen is the chief executive officer at the Center on Global Adaptation. Bloomberg“It is now either adapt or die” for the most vulnerable nations. These are the most important and urgent ways that governments can adapt to climate change if they want to avoid further catastrophes. 

Build a better power grid

Workers repair power lines after a storm in California.

California storms cause power lines to be repaired by workers. Extreme weather can cause power outages and blackouts that can prove fatal.

Paul Bersebach/MediaNews Group/Orange County Register/Getty Images


Last year’s Texas icestorm was a stark reminder about how fragile our energy system can become. A series of natural gas pipelines burst during the cold snap, causing energy prices to spike and resulting in millions of people being without power for several days. More than 100 people were affected.Hypothermia caused death. And the Texas freeze wasn’t the only such disruption to America’s power systems in 2021 — a heat wave in New York City last summer almost caused Widespread power outagesThousands of power lines were downed by Hurricane Ida in Louisiana.

Insider was told by Ted Kury, director of energy studies at The Public Utilities Research Center of Florida, that the country’s increasingly volatile weather patterns mean every region must invest in its power grid. It is up to each town or city to decide what investment should look like.

Kury stated, “There’s no place where you can find power lines that pose no threat to interfacing with the environment.” “So, all you are doing is picking the threat that you are least afraid of.”

Moving power lines underground may be the best solution in areas where wind or fire are the greatest threats. Pacific Gas & Electric’s above-ground wires have caused Numerous devastating WildfiresIn the past few decades, it has now plans to bury more than 10,000 milesof wiring to prevent future disasters. Flooding is the main danger in certain parts of the globe. Elevating critical electrical componentsStations will be required above potential floodlines. 

Kury stated that cities need to increase their grid’s redundancy in areas where extreme heat waves can cause blackouts. This will ensure that if one circuit is overwhelmed, another circuit is available to provide energy. While many of these solutions are simple, they can be costly. Each city and town will need to decide how much money they are willing to spend to protect residents and prevent service disruptions.

Kury said that redundancy will be paid for by the people. “That’s the reason why the decision must be made at the local levels.” If local leaders do not invest quickly, power outages will only become more common and could have serious consequences.

Make Mother Nature work for us

A family with a stroller finds shade under a big tree in the park.

Urban forests can cool down cities.

Jeff Greenberg/Education Images/Universal Images Group/Getty Images


When natural forces collide and man-made structures, the most severe climate catastrophes are caused by them. Last summer Hurricane Ida caused massive flooding in New York City, killing dozens.The tri-state area, and an unprecedented heatwave in the Pacific Northwest scorched asphalt laden Portland, killing 60 people are living in the cityThere are hundreds more in the region. These weather events can’t be stopped by city leaders, but they can make their cities and towns less dangerous.

Incorporating natural elements in urban areas is one way to protect residents from flooding. Grasses and other wetland plants are excellent at absorbing water, which means they can deter flooding even better than so-called “gray infrastructure” — like levees and dams. New York constructed a network of “blue-belt” wetlands on Staten Island in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. This network integrated preexisting wetland areas with the stormwater drain system. The wetlands can consume more than 350,000 gallons during storm events. reduce damage during Ida.

Natural interventions can also help to counter the so-called “urban heat island” phenomenon — when asphalt and concrete soak up the sun and heat up cities to dangerous degrees. These measures can be as simple or complex as planting more trees and plants on congested streets. Or, they can be quite ambitious like creating new urban forests that provide cool places for people. 

Give cows shade and breed harder crops

A brown cow on a cow farm with tags in his ears looks at the camera.

Extreme temperatures are extremely dangerous for cattle. One solution is to provide more shade for the cows.

Isabel Infantes/Europa Press/Getty Images


The two-fold climate problem that threatens the world’s food supply is a major problem. The first is that raising crops and breeding cattle are both very resource-intensive — agriculture and livestock account for more than 70% of the The world’s freshwater consumption, and the US agricultural industry accounts for around 10% a nation’s greenhouse gas emissions. The second problem is the fact that both crops as well as livestock are highly sensitive to climate factors. As the climate changes, America’s supply will become less stable. 

Extreme heat poses the greatest risk to livestock, especially cattle. High temperatures make cows less fertile as well as more susceptible to disease. For staple crops like wheat, corn, and soybeans, extreme swings in precipitation — like the long periods of drought followed by torrential downpours that many parts of the US now experience — can ruin massive annual harvests. 

Food producers might be able to address both of these issues through better breeding and common-sense infrastructure investment. For example, Caribbean breeders have spliced a variety of piglets.“Slick hair” geneThis makes the cows more comfortable with high temperatures and allows them to be bred into traditional cows. The answer may be simpler in some areas: Install shade structures for cows and upgrade ventilation systems at barns. 

Farmers can take many measures to protect their crops in areas with decreasing water reserves. These include choosing drought-resistant cultivars and constructing “contour Ridges”, which trap rain runoff and create miniature irrigation watersheds. 

These improvements require substantial upfront investment. Governments may need to subsidize them. However, to avoid empty shelves at grocery stores, you must take action.  

Prepare for the next pandemic

Two people in protective clothing carry sprayers attached to containers on their backs. It is an acaricide treatment to prevent the spread of ticks.

Workers spray a treatment to stop the spread of ticks in a Russian cemetery. Because of climate change, ticks are moving further north and carrying diseases.

Yuri Smityuk/TASS/Getty Images


In summer 2016, Anthrax outbreakRaced through Siberia’s Yamal peninsula, infecting thousands de reindeer and dozens more; one 12-year old boy was infected. He died from the infection. The anthrax outbreak followed a slew of extreme, climate-change-induced heat waves over the previous summers and an unusual amount of snowfall in the winters, all of which caused the permafrost to melt and expose dead carcasses that contained the disease.

Climate change is affecting the ability of many diseases to thrive even in tropical and temperate regions. As temperatures rise, diseases such as dengue fever or malaria will spread more widely in Africa. Tick-borne diseases like Lyme have spread to North America thanks to gradual warming. 

“The temperate region is expected to be hard hit especially by tickborne and mosquito-borne illnesses,” said Stavana Strutz. Strutz is a researcher who studies the effects of climate change on vector disease and co-authored a chapter for the IPCC. “You have these geographic expansions in spatial space, so things such as ticks are moving northwards, but they could also be moving up and encroaching onto new habitats.”

Strutz states that the rapid spread of these diseases makes investing in public-health measures, such as regular monitoring for mosquitoes and other potentially dangerous species, even more urgent. This could help researchers spot outbreaks early on, before they spiral out of control. Investing to improve healthcare facilities could also help to prevent systemic strains, such as those caused by the coronavirus epidemic.

Strutz stated, “We know what measures work in terms public health and beating back quite a few of these diseases.” However, the funding for the programs has been cut and they have not been promoted.

Place people in less-risky areas

A few buildings in Newtok, Alaska connected by raised wooden sidewalks due to melting permafrost.

Residents of Newtok, Alaska, had to move to a new community in 2019 because permafrost was melting.

Andrew Burton/Getty Images


Recognizing that certain places are beyond our abilities to save is one of climate change adaptation’s most difficult aspects. The most cost-effective and efficient way to respond to climate catastrophes is to move people away from danger. It can be difficult to plan for relocation because many people are strongly attached to their homes. However encouraging people to move to low-risk areas can prevent population shifts after disaster strikes. People living in high risk areas will likely have the need to move at some point. It is important for policymakers to plan ahead.

The United States made a few tentative attempts to relocate people from flood areas, with mixed results. The Federal Emergency Management Agency purchased the properties ofAt least 40,000 flood-prone homeownersIt hasn’t kept track of where residents have gone across the country. Other branches of the federal government have also taken this initiative. Relocating small CommunitiesIn their entirety, especially in Alaska and Louisiana, Indigenous villages. These programs were controversial in these communities. Each one took many years to implement, which suggests that it would be difficult to scale these efforts to larger areas without extensive planning and sufficient stipends to assist with relocation.

However, it may be impossible to relocate people in the most affected areas of the world. Kiribati, an island state in the Pacific Islands, is located on a series of islands that could become underwater by the end the century. If sea-level rise continues, it will also be uninhabitable well before then. Advancement in water kills crops and causes dangerous flooding. To provide a refugee site for the island’s remaining population, the government bought eight square miles of land in Fiji. However, this was later cancelled. The land was convertedIn a farm to feed the island’s people.  

Relocation, like all other adaptation measures, is controversial and costly. Kiribatians have struggled with the balance between safety and the cost of moving. As climate catastrophes continue to intensify, the need to act is even more urgent. The climate crisis WillWe can all be affected by disruptions in our lives, regardless of whether or not we act on them. It is better to plan for it now than wait until chaos has arrived.

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.