Now Reading
Siskiyou County wins lawsuit against water rights groups over environmental review
[vc_row thb_full_width=”true” thb_row_padding=”true” thb_column_padding=”true” css=”.vc_custom_1608290870297{background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][thb_postcarousel style=”style3″ navigation=”true” infinite=”” source=”size:6|post_type:post”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Siskiyou County wins lawsuit against water rights groups over environmental review

A long-dormant water bottling facility owned by Crystal Geyser Water Company outside of Mt. Shasta, CA. In May the company announced it would no longer pursue plans to operate the facility.

The environmental impact report prepared in Siskiyou County by the city was challenged by We Advocate Through Environmental Review and Winnemem Wintu Tribe.

They claimed county officials gave a misleading report that failed to properly consider the effects of the bottling facility on the environment.

Two lawsuits were filed by the groups, one against the city and another against the county.

A long-dormant water bottling facility owned by Crystal Geyser Water Company outside of Mt. Shasta, CA. In May the company announced it would no longer pursue plans to operate the facility.

Crystal Geyser Water Company has a long-dormant bottling facility for water outside of Mt. Shasta, CA. The company announced in May that it would no longer pursue plans for the operation of the facility.

Liam Moriarty

Crystal Geyser pulled out of plans to open the facility last year after being under pressure from the public, and the lawsuits filed by the groups.

These judgments won’t have any real-world effects, but will serve as a precedent for future environmental reviews.

The appellate court ruling sends the case back down to lower courts. It requires the courts to specify the changes that the city or county must make to the reports in compliance with the law.

The reports must also be recirculated through the public, though their approval will not impact the bottling plants at this time.

Crystal Geyser abandoned plans to build a plant and sold the land to a California developer. The new deed includes a clause that prohibits the use the land for the bottling or distribution of water.

Both plaintiffs stated in a statement that they were happy to see victory following this drawn-out fight.

The groups state that the wins in these cases show that when we work together, we can protect our water and our environment as well as the web of living things we all depend on.

They appreciated the community’s efforts in protecting local water resources.

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.