Now Reading
Students in college file legal complaints against university fossil-fuel investment

Students in college file legal complaints against university fossil-fuel investment

In February, a group of students from Yale, MIT and Princeton filed legal complaints against Vanderbilt in an effort to force their universities into ending their financial relationships to the fossil fuel industry.

Students complained that their schools violated the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Acts. A state law states that investments made by nonprofits must align with their “charitable purpose.”

All the complaints were filed with the state attorneys general the same day. They allege that fossil fuel companies pollute the environment and engage in public relations campaigns to undermine climate science. This is in direct conflict with the mission of their universities.

Students also argued that fossil fuel investments were not wise investments. Inherently riskyThey are in violation of their legal obligation to invest prudently. Monday was a day of action for climate scientistsNew fossil fuel projects could become “stranded assets” or be abandoned. The losses from stranded fuel infrastructure are estimated to be between $1 trillion to $4 trillion between 2015-2050, assuming that the world takes action against global warming above 2 degrees Celsius.
Students’ filings are part a Global rise in legal actionClimate crisis. A Recent reportGrantham Research Institute of London School of Economics revealed that the number of climate change-related legal cases has more than doubled worldwide between 2015-2021. The report found that around 800 of these cases were filed between 1986-2014, and more than 1,000 were filed over the six years following.

Karen Sokol, a distinguished professor of law at Loyola University New Orleans, said, “We’re witnessing an unprecedented wave in litigation, where individuals will go to court for certain actors to account the damages they are experiencing and the damages to come,”

Sokol said that the increase in climate cases can be attributed to the growing harms of global warming, including severe weather events and the resulting destruction, as well as the public’s increasing awareness of the problem.

CNN’s Sokol said that when harms and damage mount simultaneously with increased public awareness, people will seek redress in court. “That’s exactly what we’re seeing.”

According to the, the endowments of the five universities are more than $150 billion. Legal filings. CNN could not independently confirm the amount or how much each university was investing in fossil fuels.
Harvard and Yale students protest during the halftime of the college football game between Harvard and Yale at the Yale Bowl in New Haven, Connecticut in 2019. Demonstrators stormed the field to demand that both universities divest from fossil fuels.

CNN reached out to their respective attorneys general offices. Two of them — Connecticut’s and Massachusetts’ — confirmed that they had received the student complaints and are currently reviewing them. The New Jersey Attorney General’s office declined comment. California’s and Tennessee’s offices didn’t respond.

CNN received no response from any of the universities to the students’ complaints. Representatives from Yale Yale, Princeton, Yale and MIT referred to recent climate change mitigation efforts by their universities in emails to CNN. CNN reached Vanderbilt for comment but they did not respond.

US wind energy just hit a major milestone

Each university has released detailed plans to reduce carbon emissions on campuses by a specific date, namely 2050. Others are seeking net-zero carbon emissions in their investment portfolios or have ethical investment principles that render certain fossil fuel companies uninvestable.

According to Dee Mostofi, a university communications executive, Stanford wants to achieve net zero emissions in its operations and investments by 2050. Mostofi also said that Stanford’s investments are “fully compliant with all applicable laws regulating California charities.” Mostofi also spoke out in support of the university’s investments into clean energy and transportation.

The Stanford students know that the policies and promises are not enough.

Miriam Wallstrom is a junior at Stanford and organizer for Fossil Free Stanford. “Net-zero” means Stanford could still invest in fossil fuels. This would be offset in ways that aren’t really sufficient,” she said. “As a member the generation that will have to do the most to combat the climate crisis, and also suffer the most from severe weather events, it’s frightening and frustrating that the institution that I go to hasn’t divested, especially considering how many of my peers have done so.”

This incredibly potent planet-warming gas just set another record for the second year in a row
Carbon offset is the practice of using renewable energy to offset fossil fuel emissions. It also includes planting trees and supporting other conservation measures. However, experts disagree. They have raised doubts about the effectiveness of the schemesThis could allow individuals, countries or companies to continue to release carbon dioxide unabated.
Other higher education institutions that have taken a stand against fossil fuels, or have plans to do so, are: Brown University, Boston University, Georgetown UniversityAnd Middlebury College. Harvard UniversityAnd Cornell UniversityThey also pledged to divest soon after students filed. Legal Reported complaintsClimate Defense Project attorneys assisted the current student coalition with their assistance.

Students also highlighted that universities may have conflicts-of-interest that prevent them from adequately responding to student climate demands.

Students at Vanderbilt claim that university Chancellor Daniel Diermeier is involved in the fossil fuel industry. According to Diermeier’s CV, which can be found at a Vanderbilt address, he has previously advised companies like Shell, ExxonMobil, BP, and others. Students filed a complaint to the University. The committee responsible for investigating conflicts found it “without merit,” according a university. News release. CNN reached out to the Chancellor but was not able to provide any comment.

Yale students also note that four trustees of Yale Corporation, the charitable corporate entity responsible for managing the school’s $42 billion endowment, have ties to fossil fuels. Three of the current or former trustees are currently or recently board members for oil-and-gas companies, while one was CEO of a prominent energy firm.

Incredible before and after photos show just how much this critical reservoir has dried up

CNN reached out to Yale Corporation and Yale’s Advisory Committee on Investor Responsibility for no comment.

Molly Weiner (a Yale freshman and organizer with Yale’s Endowment Justice Coalition) stated, “The core of our campaign has been saying investing in fossil fuels was immoral.” “But the moral argument will only get us so far because the people who make these investments decisions personally benefit.”

Weiner also pointed out a discrepancy between Yale’s spending of research funds, and how it allocates a portion of its endowment.

Weiner, an environmental studies major, said that Yale is investing a lot in climate research. “But that is made moot by $800 million in fossil fuel industry funds at Yale. They are almost incompatible.”

Ted Hamilton, cofounder of Climate Defense Project, hopes Yale and other universities will decide to divest themselves. He said that state attorneys general could issue orders mandating universities not to invest in fossil fuel industries. This would be a rare move.

The climate litigation is largely unresolved globally, with many cases still moving through the courts. Nearly two dozen lawsuits pending in the US seek monetary damages from fossil fuel company. They claim that they have deceived the public by misrepresenting the harmful effects of fossil fuels. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University.

Some cases have been successful.

A German court heard a lawsuit. Emission of a rulingThe government should be required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a more ambitious manner.
A Netherlands case has created a new “duty to care” for the government in order to protect the public from climate changes. A court in the Netherlands recently reached a groundbreaking decisionShell must reduce its global emissions by 45% by 2030, starting at 2019 levels.

Sokol spoke of the success stories in international cases and said, “There’s this momentum.” “Courts are defining their role in our new climate reality.”

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.