BUnder our feet is an ecosystem that is so extraordinary, it challenges our imagination. It’s as diverse and varied as a rainforest, or a coral Reef. It is what we depend on. Our food is 99 percent healthyYet, we don’t know much about it. Soil.
Below one square metre of undeveloped ground in the Earths mid-latitudesIn the UK, there could be hundreds of thousands of small animals. Approximately 90% of the species they belong to have yet to be identified. One gram of this soil contains approximately one kilometre. fungal filaments.
I couldn’t believe what I saw when I first looked at a lump soil with a powerful zoom lens. It burst into existence as soon as I found its focal length. I saw springtails, tiny insects similar to insects in dozens different shapes and sizes. There were half a million of these round, crabby mites in some soils.
Then I started to see creatures that I had never seen before. When I looked up what I thought was a tiny white centipede, it turned out to be a completely different form of life, the symphylid. I spotted something that looked like it had come straight from a Japanese anime. It was long and low, with two fine antennae at each end, and poised and springing like a virile horse or virile dragon. It was a bristletail or dipluran.
As I worked my ways through the lump, I discovered animals whose existence was unknown to me despite my zoology degree and my lifelong immersion in natural history. After spending two hours studying a kilogram worth of soil, I realized I had seen more animals than I would in a week on safari in the Serengeti.
Its actual nature is more fascinating than its diversity and abundance. Most people think it is a boring mass of rock and dead plants. It is actually a biological structure that living creatures have built to ensure their survival. Microbes create cements from carbon by sticking mineral particles together. This creates pores and passages through the which water, oxygen, and nutrients can pass. They create tiny clumps that are used by soil animals to build larger labyrinths.
Because soil is fractally sized, its structure is constant regardless of magnification. Unconsciously, bacterias, fungi, plants, and soil animals create an immeasurable, intricate, endlessly ramifying structure that, like Dust in a Philip Pullman novel organizes itself into coherent worlds. This biological structure helps explain soils’ resistance to floods and droughts.
It also reveals the reason soil can quickly degrade when it is farmed. When nitrogen fertilizer is applied to soil, microbes burn through carbon. Cement that holds their catacombs together. The pores cave in. The passages collapse. The soil becomes dense, airless, and compacted.
BBut none of the above captures what soil is all about. Let’s start with something that will change our perception of how we survive. Plants The soil should be allowed to absorb between 11% and 40 percent of all sugars They produce them by photosynthesis. They do not accidentally leak them. They intentionally pump them into the ground. Stranger still is that they transform some of these sugars into complex compounds before releasing them.
Producing such chemicals takes energy and resources. This looks like wasting money. Why are they doing it? The secret to unlocking the door to a secret garden is in the answer.
These complex chemicals are Pumped into the area immediately surrounding the roots of the plantsThis is the rhizosphere. They are free to manage and create its relationships.
The soil is full bacteria. The compounds they produce give soil its earthy smell. They wait in suspended animation for the messages that will awaken them. These messages are the chemical compounds that the plant releases. These messages are so complex because the plant does not want to alert bacteria generally, but only the specific species. Some bacteria promotes its growth. Plants speak a complex chemical language that only microbes can understand.
A plant root releases its messages when it pushes into soil. The bacteria that responds to the call consumes the sugars and proliferates to form the most diverse microbial communities on Earth. There can be a One gram of the Rhizosphere contains billions of bacteriaThey unlock the nutrients the plant needs to grow and produce growth hormones. The plants vocabulary ChangesIt will vary from one place to another and from time to time depending on its needs. It can become deficient in certain nutrients or the soil is too dry, or it may become sick. Calls to the bacteria speciesThis can be very helpful.
If you take a step back, you will discover something that changes our understanding about life on Earth. Although the rhizosphere is outside the plant, it functions as part of the whole. It could be described as the plants external gut. Uncanny similarities exist between the rhizosphere (where bacteria also thrives in astounding numbers) and the human stomach. Both systems are characterized by microbes that break down organic material into simpler compounds that can be absorbed by plants and people. Although there are over 1,000 major groups of bacteria (phyla), the four most common are found in the rhizosphere as well as the cytosphere. The guts of mammals.
Just like human breast milk has sugars called “oligosaccharides”, which do not feed the baby, but the bacteria in its gut, young plants also release large amounts sucrose into the soil to nourish and develop their microbiomes. The friendly microbes that live in the rhizosphere protect the root from invading pathogens just like the bacteria in our stomachs. The plants immune system is just like the colon bacteria. It sends chemical messages and educates our immune systems. Educated and primedBy bacteria in the Rhizosphere.
While soil might not look as beautiful as a rainforest, or a coral reef in the ocean, once you get to know it, it will be just as beautiful for your mind. This understanding is crucial for survival.
WFaced with the greatest dilemma humankind has ever faced: Feeding the world without destroying the planet. Already, Agriculture is the greatest cause of global povertyOf habitat destructionThe greatest causeThe global Wildlife lossThe greatest causeThe global The extinction crisis. It is responsible to about 80% of the deforestationThis has happened in the last century. 24,000 species are among the 28,000 that are at imminent risk of extinction. Threatened by agriculture. Wild species make up only 29% of the bird’s weight on Earth. The rest is chicken. Only 4% are wild mammals. 36% of mammals in the world are humans, and 60% are livestock.
This situation is only going to get worse unless something changes. There is plenty of food in principle, even for a growing population. About half of the calories farmers produce are now being consumed by consumers. Feed livestockDemand for animal products is on the rise. The world will not change the way it eats unless there is a fundamental shift in its eating habits by 2050. Need to grow about 50% more grain. How can we do this without destroying much of the rest life on Earth?
As farming is destroying important Earth systems, so is their destruction. This poses a threat to our food supply. Even current production levels may not be sustainable. Climate change is likely to happen. Wet areas are wetter, dry places are dryer. One estimate suggests that one more degree of heating would cause parch 32% of the earth’s surface is land. A severe drought could simultaneously affect the arc by the middle century. From Portugal to Pakistan. And that’s before we get to the Rising economic fragilityThe Global food systemGeopolitical pressures or geopolitical threats, such as the current war with Ukraine, that might pose a threat 30% of the world’s wheat imports are exported.
It is not only the quantity of production that is at risk but also its quality. Higher temperatures and higher CO concentrations can lead to higher temperatures.2Reduces the amount of vitamins, minerals, and protein in crops Include. Zinc deficiency is a known problem. More than a million people are affected. Even though we don’t often discuss it, one paper describes the declining concentrations of nutrients. Existential threats.
Some crop scientists believe that we can reverse these trends by increasing yields in areas that are still productive. However, their hopes rest on unrealistic assumptions. These assumptions are based on unrealistic assumptions. 146% more freshwater is required to support the anticipated increase in crop yields. Today used. One problem: water doesn’t exist.
Our water use has changed over the last 100 years. Six-fold increase. 70% of the water that we draw from rivers, lakes, and aquifers is used to water crops. Already, water scarcity has affected 4 billion people. For at least one month per year33 major cities, including So Paulo (Cape Town), Los Angeles, Chennai, Los Angeles, and Los Angeles are also included. Extreme water stress can threaten. Farmers are increasingly dependent on melting snowpacks and glaciers for water as groundwater becomes less plentiful. But they are also shrinking.
The valley of Indus is a potential flashpoint. It is home to three nuclear power (India, Pakistan, and China), as well as many unstable regions. Already, 95% of the rivers’ flow is extracted. As the population and economy grow, the demand for water in the catchment should be 44% more than the supply. Global warming has caused the melting of glaciers in the Hindu Kush (and the Himalayas) faster than they have been accumulating. As a result, more water has been flowing down rivers. This is one reason why agriculture has been able intensify and cities have grown. This won’t last. Between one- and two thirds of the ice mass will be gone by the end of the century. It is possible that they have disappeared. It is hard to imagine this ending well.
All this is before we get to the soil, the thin layer of air and rock on which human life depends. We treat it like dirt. There are international treaties for telecommunications, civil aviation, investment guarantee, intellectual property, doping in sports, and psychotropic substances. However, there is no global treaty for soil. The idea that this complex system, which is not well understood, can withstand everything we throw at it and still support us could be one of the most dangerous of all our beliefs.
In rich countries, where the soil is often in good condition, soil degradation is a problem.Winter rains can be left exposed and bare.Overfertilization can cause it to be compacted or even destroyed. pesticidesIts rip through Foodwebs. It tends to be worse in poorer countries, partly because extreme rain, cyclones or hurricanes can strip the land of its soil, and partly because hungry individuals are often driven to cultivate steep slopes. More than 70% of arable land in some countries, mainly in Central America, South-east Asia and tropical Africa, is now vacant. suffering severe erosion, gravely threatening future production.
Climate change can cause more severe droughts or storms, and this will increase the danger. It is possible to lose soil resilience slowly or subtly. It might not be obvious until a shock causes the underground system to collapse. The erosion rate of soil that is degraded can increase when there is severe drought. rise 6,000-fold. The soil crumbles. Fertile lands turn to dustbowls.
Some people have responded to these threats calling for the relocalization and de-intensification (or de-intensification) of farming. I can understand their concerns. Their vision is mathematically impossible.
Sign up to our Inside Saturday newsletter for an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the making of the magazines biggest features, as well as a curated list of our weekly highlights.
A study in the journal Nature Food2,200km is the minimum distance the world’s people can be fed. This is the shortest distance that food can travel to ensure that we don’t starve. It is 3,800km for those who rely on wheat and other cereals. These crops are consumed by 25% of the world’s population. Food must be grown at least 5,200km.
Why? Why? Because most people live in large cities or large valleys. Their hinterlands are too small and often too hot, dry, or cold to feed them. Many of the world’s food must be grown in large, lightly populated lands like the Canadian prairies, US plains, large tracts in Russia, Ukraine, and the Brazilian interior. Then it is shipped to densely populated areas.
Reducing the intensity of agriculture means using more land to produce the exact same amount of food. The most important environmental issue is land use. The more land that is used for farming, the less there is for forests, wetlands, savannahs, wild grasslands, and the higher the rate of wildlife extinction. All farming, no matter how careful or kind, requires a radical simplification and alteration of natural ecosystems.
Urban sprawl is the indiscriminate use of land for housing or infrastructure, which is why environmentalists are against it. But agricultural sprawl, which uses large amounts land to produce small amounts food, has transformed vast areas. While only 1% of the land in the world is under cultivation, it is still a significant portion. Useful for building and infrastructureCrops occupy 12%, while grazing, which is the most extensive type of farming, occupies 5%. Uses 28%. Only 15% of the land is, however. Protected for Nature. But the meat and milk of animals that rely on grazing only provide just 1% of the world’s protein.
One paper examined what would happen if all Americans followed the advice of celebrity chefs, and switched to pasture-fed beef over grain-fed beef. It This is what we foundBecause cattle grow slower on grass, their number would need to increase by 30% while the area that they are fed would rise by 270%. Even if the US cut all its forests and drained its wetlands, dried its deserts, and abolished its national parks it would still need to import most its beef.
Already, a large portion of beef purchased in the US comes from Brazil. Brazil became the world’s largest beef producer in 2018. worlds largest exporter. This meat is often promoted to be pasture-fed. Many of these pastures were created. By illegally clearing the rainforest. 3m sqkm of biodiverse locations could be lost worldwide by meat production In 35 years. This is almost India’s size.
Animal farming is compatible with rich, functional ecosystems only when the livestock population is extremely small. For example, Knepp WildlandA project in West Sussex, where small groups of cattle and sheep roam freely on large estates, is often citedAs a way of reconciling meat and wildlife. While it’s a great example in rewilding, it’s a horrible example of food production.
If this system were to be applied across 10% of UK’s farmland and if we, as its champions suggest, obtained our meat this manner, it would supply each person with 420g of meat per annum. EnoughFor around three meals. We could have a prime steak approximately once every three year. If all the UK farmland could be managed in this way, it might Send us your feedback75kcal/day (one-third of our requirement) in beef and no other food.
However, this is not the way it would be distributed. The very wealthy would eat meat every single week, while others would not eat meat at all. People who believe we should only buy meat like this, and who often use the slogan “less and better”, present an exclusive product as though it were available to everyone.
Food writers, chefs, and campaigners rail against intensive agriculture and the harm it causes us and the planet. But the problem isn’t the adjective. It’s the noun. It is not intensive farming or extensive agriculture that causes the destruction of Earth systems, but a devastating combination of both.
SWhat can we do to make this happen? Part of the solution is to get as much food production from farming as possible. The enabling technology is just what we need, as luck would have it. Precision fermentation, Produces protein and fat in breweries, from soil bacteria, fed with water, hydrogen, CO2and minerals, has the PotentialIt will replace all livestock farming, soya farming, and large amounts of vegetable oil production. It will also drastically reduce land use and other environmental impacts.
This remarkable luck is at risk from intellectual property rights. It could be easily taken over by the same corporations that monopolise global meat and grain trade. This must be stopped: patents need to be weakened and antitrust laws strong. This would be ideal. Should be open source.
We could then relocalize production: local businesses could use the new fermentation technologies. Serve local markets. Some of the poorest countries in the world are also rich in sunlight so they could make good of a technology that uses green hydrogen. Microbial production is a nightmare for those who want food sovereignty and justice. But it could provide both more efficiently than farming.
These technologies give us the chance to transform our food system and our relationship with the living environment for the first time since Neolithic times. Both intensive and extensive agriculture can yield vast amounts of land. An age of regenesis could replace the age of extinction.
We would still need to produce vegetables, fruits, roots, cereals, and fruit. How can we do this safely and efficiently? Our new understanding of the soil could be the answer.
Techniques developed by a vegetable farmer are used on a farm in south Oxfordshire. Iain Tolhurst TollyThey seem to have anticipated recent discoveries made by soil scientists.
Tolly, a tough-looking man in his mid-60s, has a large, strong jaw, long, blond skin, one gold earring, and hands grained with oil and dirt. Tolly began farming without any training or instruction. He didn’t have land or the means to purchase it. After a series of misadventures he managed to lease seven acres (17.3 acres), of very poor land at a reduced rental, 34 years back.
He said that no conventional grower would ever look at this ground. It is 40% stone. It would be called building rubble. It isn’t arable and would be considered only suitable for trees or grass. Over the past 12 months, however, we have harvested 120 tonnes worth of vegetables and fruits.
Amazingly, Tolly has been growing this rubble for 34+ years without any pesticides, herbicides and mineral treatments. He pioneered a stockfree organic method of growing. He does not use livestock or livestock products in any part of the farming cycle and he also does not use artificial inputs.
This was a method of removing fertility from the land, but it wasn’t known until he proved it. Particularly vegetables are considered hungry crops and require lots of extra nutrients to grow. Tolly, despite adding no nutrients, has increased his yields to the lower limit of what intensive growers can achieve with artificial fertilizers on good land. This feat was widely considered impossible. His soil’s fertility has been increasing steadily, which is remarkable.
One June was my first visit to Tollys. I was amazed at the variety and health of Tollys’ crops. One plot was a blue cloud of onion plants. The other was a patchwork with sea greens: young cauliflower plants as well as a variety of cabbage and Kale. Rows of rainbow chard were scattered with green, white, and crimson stems. From the tight pillars that held the flowers, broad bean pods were beginning to grow. His potatoes were in full bloom with nightshade sinister stamens and yellow stings. Courgettes stood out rudely behind the trumpet flowers. There were tomatoes, peppers and beans of all types, herbs, parsnips and celeriac, as well as cucumbers and lettuces. He grows 100 varieties of vegetables and sells them in his farm shop as well as to subscribers to his vegetable box.
Scientists studying his farm found that there were untended banks between the plots, which scientists had separated. 75 species of wildflowers. These banks house the insect predators which control crop pests and are an essential part of his system. He doesn’t use pesticides but none of the vegetable plants he saw had any evidence of insect damage. The leaves were dark, wide, and with very few spots or holes.
Tolly developed a revolutionary new model for horticulture almost by himself. It looks magical at first. It is actually the result many years of careful experiments.
Two of his innovations seem to be critical. He describes the first as making the system watertight. This prevents rain from washing through the soil and taking nutrients with it. This means that the soil is almost never left bare. An understorey of green manure is found beneath his vegetables. These plants cover the soil. I could see thousands and thousands of seedlings under his pumpkin leaves, which were the weeds he had intentionally sown. The green manure is added to the soil after the crops have been harvested and it soon fills in the gaps. It soon turns into a thicket full of colour: blue chicory, crimson clover and yellow melilot, mauve, and trefoil. Phacelia, pink sainfoin.
Tolly said that there’s green manure beneath the green manure. It flowers as soon as the bigger plants are cut, and the bees go wild.
Some plants in Tolly’s mix have deep roots which draw nutrients from the subsoil. Tolly runs a mower through them, cutting them into a coarse straw. This straw is then pulled down by earthworms and incorporated into the soil. The idea behind this is to allow plants to put back as much carbon and mineral as we take.
Tolly says that green manure is a fertilizer that binds nutrients, fixes nitrogen, and adds carbon to the soil. The more plants you sow, you will encourage more bacteria and fungi. Each plant has its own association. The soil biology is held together by roots.
Another important innovation is to spread over the green manure an average one millimetre per year of chipped, composted and wood chips. These can be made from local trees or delivered by a local arborist. This small modification seems to make a big difference. His yields nearly doubled in the five years following his addition of woodchip. Tolly explained that woodchip is not a fertiliser, but an inoculant that stimulates microbes. The wood’s carbon encourages bacteria and fungi to bring the soil back into life. Tolly believes that he is adding enough carbon to aid the microbes in building the soil, but not enough to lock up nitrogen. What happens?If you give them more than they require.
Tolly seems to be strengthening and diversifying relationships in the rhizosphere, the plants’ external gut. He seems to have encouraged bacteria, by keeping roots in the soil and increasing the number of plant species, to add just the right amount carbon to the soil. This will improve the soil structure and help his plants to grow.
Tolly’s success forces us all to think about what fertility means. It is not about the nutrients in the soil. It also depends on whether nutrients are available at the right time and if they can be safely stored away when they are not needed. Crops can regulate their interactions with bacteria in the soil, which ensures that nutrients are only unlocked when they are needed. In other words fertility is a property that a functioning ecosystem has. Soil chemistry is a topic that has received a lot of attention in farm science. The biology is more important than we realize.
Can Tolly’s method be replicated? So far, the results have been encouraging. Inconclusive. If we can find ways to improve the relationship between crop plant and bacteria and fungi, it should be possible for yields to rise while reducing inputs. A greener revolution could be possible with our growing knowledge of soil ecology.
I believe this approach could be combined with another set of innovations by a non-profit organization in Salina, Kansas called the Land Institute. It seeks to develop perennial grains crops to replace the annual crops from which we get the vast majority of our food. Annuals are plants which die after only one growing season. Perennials live from one year to another.
Large areas are dominated by annuals Rare in nature. They are more likely to colonize the ground after disasters such as fire, flood, landslide, volcanic eruption, or other natural disasters that expose soil or rock. We must maintain the land in good condition when cultivating annuals. Catastrophic state. We would be less dependent on destroying living systems to produce our food if we grew perennial grain crops.
For over 40 years, the Land Institute searched the globe for perennial species that could replace our annual crops. It has already developed a perennial rice that matches the yields of Yunnan University’s Fengyi Hu. In some cases, the limit is exceededThese are the modern annual breeds. Farmers are lining up to buy seeds. Annual rice farming can lead to devastating erosion, but the long roots of perennial varieties bind and protect soil. Some perennial rice crops have been harvested six times. Without replanting.
Perennials can be considered their own green manures. Their relationships with microbes, which fix nitrogen from the air, strengthen as they grow older. Other minerals can be released. One estimate SuggestionsThe water that falls on the ground in perennial systems is five times that of annual crops.
The Land Institute is working on promising lines of perennial wheat, oils crops, and other grains. Perennial plants’ deep roots and strong structures could make them more resilient to climate chaos. The institute is breeding perennial sunflowers. Two severe droughts were endured.One of these completely destroyed the annual sunflowers they had grown next to them.
While there is no panacea, I believe some of the elements of a new global system of food that is more resilient and distributed, more diverse, more sustainable and more sustainable are starting to fall into place. It will be built on our knowledge of the soil, which is the most neglected of all major ecosystems. It could resolve the most important of all problems: how can we survive without destroying the living systems upon which we depend. Underground is the future.
George Monbiot, a Guardian Live speaker, will discuss Regenesis in London on Monday, 30 May. You can purchase tickets to the event in person or via the livestream. Here.
Penguin Books published Regenesis: Feeding the World without Devouring the Planet on May 20th, by George Monbiot. Get your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may be applicable.
