Now Reading
There are still many steps to take to reach the global climate change goal
[vc_row thb_full_width=”true” thb_row_padding=”true” thb_column_padding=”true” css=”.vc_custom_1608290870297{background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][thb_postcarousel style=”style3″ navigation=”true” infinite=”” source=”size:6|post_type:post”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

There are still many steps to take to reach the global climate change goal

The world can still reach the two internationally agreed upon goals of limiting global warming if all countries do what they have promised. A new study has found that the planet is exceeding the threshold scientists believe will protect Earth better.

According to a Wednesday study in Nature, the world could keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit), which is a far cry from what seemed impossible.

This will only be possible if countries fulfill their pledged national targets to curb carbon emissions by 2030 as well as their more distant promises to reach net zero carbon emissions by the middle of the century, according to the study.

This 2 degree warmer world is still a significant factor What scientists call “scientific”As a highly disturbed climate with stronger storms, higher seas and animal and plant extinctions as well as disappearing coral and melting ice, and more people dying from heat and smog. It is not the goal world leaders really want: 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7° Fahrenheit) since preindustrial times. If the world does not achieve dramatic new emission cuts, it will surpass that goal. The study authors stated that this is unlikely to happen in the next decade.

Both 1.5-degrees of 2-degrees and 1.5-degrees of compliance are part of the SMART Goals. 2015 Paris Climate PactThe Follow-up in Glasgow 2021 agreement. The 2-degree goal dates back many years.

With the promises made, we can keep warming below the symbolic 2 degree mark for the first time. According to Malte Meinshausen of the University of Melbourne, the study’s lead author, this assumes that countries will keep their promises.

This is a big if, even if climate scientists and authors agree. This means that political leaders will actually do what they say.

This optimistic scenario is what the study examines. It does not examine whether governments are making an effort to implement their long term targets or whether they are credible. Niklas Hohne, a German scientist at New Climate Institute, said that the study did not include Niklas Hohne, who was analyzing pledges for Climate Action Tracker. We know that governments have not yet implemented their long-term targets.

Hohnes and other pledge trackers have found similar results. Meinshausens team also found that it is possible to limit warming to 2 degrees. Meinshausen’s study is unique in that it has been peer-reviewed and published by a scientific journal.

Yes, countries must live up to their promises in the 2-degree world. Meinshausen said that cheaper wind and solar have shown that carbon emission cuts can happen faster than anticipated and that some countries will be able to exceed their promised cuts. He also stated that climate action works best when there are first policies and then promises, so it is reasonable to trust countries.

Meinshausen stated that limiting the warming to 2°C is still a major improvement over just five or ten year ago. Implemented policies and targets can actually help reduce future temperatures. Countries need to be optimistic. Yes, there is some hope.

Keep up with Tampa Bays top headlines

Keep up to date with Tampa Bay’s top headlines

Get our DayStarter newsletter for free

Every weekday morning, Well delivers the latest news and information.

Meinshausen said that around 20 percent to 30% of that hope is due the Paris climate accord, while the rest is due earlier investments by countries which made green energy technologies more affordable than dirty fossil fuels such oil and coal.

He said that even though it was good news, it wasn’t all good.

Meinshausen stated that neither we have a margin for error (on barely limiting it to 2 degrees) nor does the pledges place us on a path to 1.5 degrees.

2018 was the year that the United Nations scientific experts team looked into the differences between the 1.5 and 2-degree thresholds. Earth is subject to much worse and greater damage with 2 degrees of warming. The world has been trying to make it so far. The goal of 1.5 degrees possible.

Earth has warmed at least 1.1% Celsius (2 degrees Fahrenheit), since pre-industrial times. This is often considered the late 1800s. So 2 degrees of warming actually means another 0.9 degrees Celsius (1.6 degree Fahrenheit), hotter than now.

Meinshausens analysis seems solid and solid, but there could be assumptions that could be crucial, said Glen Peters. Glen Peters is a climate scientist who tracks the emissions of Global Carbon Project.

The most common assumption is that nations somehow achieve net zero carbon emissions. This is a major assumption, according to Peters, research director at the Cicero Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway.

He said that while making pledges for 2050 is easy, backing them up by short-term action is difficult. He also noted that most countries will have five to six elections between now 2050.

By Seth Borenstein, Science Writer at Associated Press.

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.