[ad_1]
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published at TomDispatch.com. To keep up with important articles like this, sign upSubscribe to TomDispatch.com to receive the most recent updates
Consider us at the edge a moment of profound change unlike any other time in history, not even centuries. We will live in such drastically altered circumstances by the middle of the century that the current decade, 2020s, will seem like another era, perhaps similar to the Middle Ages. And I’m not talking about the future development of flying cars, cryogenics, or even as-yet-unimaginable versions of space travel.
The United States has been the global leader for 75 years but is now slowly losing its grip on global hegemony. As Washington’s power begins to fade, the liberal international system it created by founding the United Nations in 1945 is facing potentially fatal challenges.
After more than 180 centuries of Western global dominion and leadership, the focus is shifting from West towards East. Beijing is likely be the epicenter of a new international order that could actually break longstanding Western traditions in law and human rights.
More crucially, however, after two centuries of propelling the world economy to unprecedented prosperity, the use of fossil fuels—especially coal and oil—will undoubtedly fade away within the next couple of decades. Meanwhile, for the first time since the last Ice Age ended 11,000 years ago, thanks to the greenhouse gases those fossil fuels are emitting into the atmosphere, the world’s climate is changing in ways that will, by the middle of this century, start to render significant parts of the planet uninhabitable for a quarter, even possibly half, of humanity.
The level of carbon dioxide (CO) has fallen for the first time in 800,000.2) in the atmosphere has The past is goneFrom 280 parts per Million, the current high is 410 parts. That, in turn, is unleashing climate feedback loops that, by century’s end, if not well before, will aridify the globe’s middle latitudes, partly melt the polar ice caps, and raise sea levels drastically. (Don’t even think about a Future MiamiOr Shanghai!
Can we use more than just guesswork to see how these changes will affect the world’s evolving order? History, my own field, is not able to predict the future. Social sciences like economics, political science, and political science, however, are unable to predict long-term trends beyond the next recession or election. Uniquely among the disciplines, however, environmental science has developed diverse analytical tools for predicting the effects of climate change all the way to this century’s end.
These predictions are so accurate that leaders in finance, science, and politics around the world are now starting to think about how they can reorganize entire societies and economies to adapt to the upcoming disasters. Yet, few people have begun to consider the possible impact of climate change on global power. It may be possible to predict the course of governance in the next 50 years by combining political projections and climate change trajectories.
Social-science analysis has predicted the end to US global power for many years. The US National Intelligence Council, for example, uses economic projections to predict the end of US global power. that, by 2030, “Asia will have surpassed North America and Europe combined in terms of global power,” while “China alone will probably have the largest economy, surpassing that of the United States a few years before 2030.” Using similar methods, the accounting firm PwC Calculated that China’s economy would become 60 percent larger than that of the United States by 2030.
If climate science proves accurate, however, the hegemony Beijing could achieve by perhaps 2030 will last, at best, only a couple of decades or less before unchecked global warming ensures that the very concept of world dominance, as we’ve known it historically since the sixteenth century, may be relegated to a past age like so much else in our world.
Considering that likelihood as we peer dimly into the decades between 2030 and 2050 and beyond, the international community will surely have good reason to forge a new kind of world order—one made for a planet truly in danger and unlike any that has come before.
The Rise of Chinese Global Hegemony
China’s rise to world power could be considered not just the result of its own initiative but also of American inattention. While Washington was mired in endless wars in the Greater Middle East in the decade following the September 2001 terrorist attacks, Beijing began using a trillion dollars of its swelling dollar reserves to build a tricontinental economic infrastructure it called the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that would shake the foundations of Washington’s world order. Not only has this scheme already gone a long way toward incorporating much of Africa and Asia into Beijing’s version of the world economy, but it has simultaneously lifted many millions out of poverty.
Washington funded reconstruction of Europe’s ravaged Europe during the Cold War and the creation of 100 new countries from colonies. But as the Cold War ended in 1991, more than a third of humanity was still living in extreme poverty, abandoned by Washington’s then-reigning neoliberal ideology that consigned social change to the whims of the free market. Nearly all of 2018 half the world’s population, or about 3.4 billion people, were simply struggling to survive on the equivalent of five dollars a day, creating a vast global constituency for Beijing’s economic leadership.
China’s social transformation began at home. The Communist Party led the transformation of an agricultural society into an industrial powerhouse in the 1980s. It was driven by the greatest mass migration of all time, with millions moving from one country to another. Economy grew nearly 10 percent annually for 40 years and lifted 800 million people out of poverty—the fastest sustained rate ever recorded by any country. Between 2006 and 2016, the number of people who have been lifted out of poverty has increased by almost 10 percent. Its industrial outputThe value of the Chinese economy grew from $1.2 trillion up to $3.2 trillion, leaving the United States behind at $2.2 trillion and making China the workshop in the world.
By the time Washington awoke to China’s challenge and tried to respond with what President Barack Obama called a “strategic pivot” to Asia, it was too late. Beijing had already $4 trillion of foreign reserves in 2014 and Beijing was determined to respond. launchedIts Belt and Road Initiative EstablishingAsian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which has 56 member countries and impressive capital of $100 billion. Xi Jinping addressed the Belt and Road Forum of 29 world leaders that met in Beijing in May 2017. Hailed the initiative as the “project of the century,” aimed both at promoting growth and improving “people’s well-being” through “poverty alleviation.” Indeed, two years later a World Bank study FoundBRI transportation projects had already boosted the gross domestic product of 55 countries by a solid 3.4%.
Beijing seems to have an underlying plan to transcend the great distances which have historically separated Asia and Europe. Its goal? To create a unitary market that can be established soon. CoverThe vast Eurasian land mass. This scheme will consolidate China’s control over a continent that is home to 70 percent of the world’s population and productivity. It could also weaken the US geopolitical hold over a region which has long been at the heart of and key to its global power. A massive construction effort has laid the foundation for this ambitious transnational scheme. It has covered much of Central Asia and China in less than two decades with a huge triad of high-speed rail lines and energy pipelines.
Let’s start by saying that Beijing is building a transcontinental network for natural gas and oil pipelines, which will be in alliance with Russia. It will span 6,000 miles from North Atlantic Ocean to South China Sea.
Beijing is the second member of that triad. Built the world’s largest high-speed rail system, with more than 15,000 miles already operational in 2018 and plans for a network of nearly 24,000 miles by 2025. All this, in turn, is just a partial step toward what’s expected to be a full-scale transcontinental rail system that started with the “Eurasian Land Bridge” track running from China through Kazakhstan to Europe. Beijing plans to add branch-lines from China southward toward Singapore, Southwest through Pakistan, and then onto Europe. From PakistanThrough Iran to Turkey
To complete its transport triad, China has also constructed an impressive set of highways, representing (like those pipelines) a problematic continuation of Washington’s current petrol-powered world order. It didn’t have a single expressway in 1990. It was complete in 2017. Had been built87,000 miles worth of highways, almost twice the length of the US interstate system. Even that breathtaking number can’t begin to capture the extraordinary engineering feats necessary—the tunneling through steep mountains, the spanning of wide rivers, the crossing of deep gorges on towering pillars, and the spinning of concrete webs around massive cities.
Simultaneously, China was also becoming the world’s largest auto manufacturer as the number of vehicles on its roads The skyrocketed2019: 340 million Over America’s 276 million. All of this news is not good news. After all, by clinging to coal production on a major scale, while reaching for a bigger slice of the world’s oil imports for its transportation triad, China’s greenhouse-gas emissions doubled from just 14 percent of the world’s total in 2000 to 30 percent in 2019, far surpassing that of the United States, previously the planet’s leading emitter. Only 150 vehicles Per thousand people, compared to 850 in America, its auto industry still has ample growth potential—good news for its economy, but terrible news for the global climate (even if China remains in the FrontElectric cars are being developed and used.
China has actually increased its domestic coal production more that a thousand times, from 32 million metric tonnes in 1949 to a staggering 900,000 metric tons in 2009. RecordUp to 4.1 billion tonnes by 2021. China’s world-leading position in wind power is still evident, even if you consider the massive natural-gas pipelines that it is building, its huge hydropower dams, or the enormous natural-gas pipelines that it is building. DependedIt relies on coal for a staggering 57 percent of its total energy consumption, even though its share of global coal-fired electricity is astonishingly small ClimbingIt grew steadily to a record 53% In other words, nothing, it seems, can break that country’s leadership of its insatiable hunger for the dirtiest of all fossil fuels.
Beijing has been a global leader in economic growth. China continues to promote coal-fired power, despite its pledges to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions at recent UN Climate Conferences. The Institute of International Finance will be launching in 2020. reported that 85 percent of all projects under Beijing’s BRI entailed high greenhouse-gas emissions, particularly the 63 coal-fired electrical plants the project was financing worldwide.
China had already begun construction of new coal-fueled electrical power plants when the UN climate conference began in 2019. Combination capacity of 121 gigawatts—substantially more than the 105 gigawatts being built by the rest of the world combined. China was the biggest single source of pollution by 2019 Accounting nearly one-third of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, UN Secretary General António Guterres was warning that such emissions were “putting billions of people at immediate risk.” With an impassioned urgency, he Requirements “a death knell for coal and fossil fuels before they destroy our planet” by banning all new coal-fired power plants and phasing them out of developed nations by 2030.
Together, the planet’s two great imperial powers, China and the United States, Accounted for44 percent of total CO2Both have made slow progress towards renewable energy in the past few years, and their emissions are expected to rise in 2019. In a joint declaration at the November 2021 Glasgow climate conference, the United States agreed “to reach 100% carbon-pollution-free electricity by 2035,” while China promised to “phase down” (but note, not “phase out”) coal starting with its “15th Five-Year Plan.”
The US commitment soon died a quiet death in Congress, where President Biden’s own Party killedHis green-energy initiative. Amid all the applause at Glasgow, nobody paid much attention to the fact that China’s next five-year plan doesn’t even start until 2026, just as President Xi Jinping’s promiseThe perfect formula to avoid the climate catastrophe that awaits us all is carbon neutrality by 2060.
China is digging its own (and our) graves with its hell-bent drive towards development.
Climate Catastrophe Circa 2050
Even if China were to rise to the top of the world power rankings around 2030, the rapid pace and severity of climate change will likely limit its hegemony in the coming decades. Beijing will be forced by global warming to reduce its projection of global power to address domestic problems as Beijing is battered by the end of the century.
Climate Central scientists were active in 2017 by the non-profit group. CalculatedFor example, rising seas and storm surges could flood areas inhabited worldwide by 275 million people by 2060 or 2070. Considered “the most vulnerable major city in the world to serious flooding.” In that sprawling metropolis, 17.5 million people are likely to be displaced as most of the city “could eventually be submerged in water, including much of the downtown area.”
A 2019 report on rising sea level incites us to move the date of the disaster by at least a decade Nature Communications FoundIt is estimated that 150 million people live on land that will soon be submerged by 2050. Shanghai was also found to be in serious danger. There, Rising waters “threaten to consume the heart” of the metropolis and its surrounding cities, crippling one of China’s main economic engines. Much of the city has been dredged from the sea and swamp since the 15th century. It is likely that it will return to the waters it came from in the next three decades.
Simultaneously, soaring temperatures are expected to devastate the North China Plain between Beijing and Shanghai, one of that country’s prime agricultural regions currently inhabited by 400 million people, nearly a third of that country’s population. It could be one of the most dangerous places on the planet.
“This spot is going to be the hottest spot for deadly heat waves in the future,” Elfatih Eltahir at MIT is a climate specialist. PublishedHis findings were published in the journal Nature Communications. Between 2070 and 2100, he estimates, the region could face hundreds of periods of “extreme danger” and perhaps five lethal periods of 35° Wet Bulb Temperature (where a combination of heat and high humidity prevents the evaporation of the sweat that cools the human body). A healthy person at rest will die in six hours.
The impact of climate change on North China is not likely to be sudden and catastrophic. It is likely that it will be gradual and cumulative, increasing steadily with each decade. If the “Chinese century” does indeed start around 2030, it’s unlikely to last long once its main financial center at Shanghai is flooded out and its agricultural heartland is baking in insufferable heat.
A Democratic World Order
After 2050, the international community may face a growing contradiction or even a head-on collision between the two fundamental principles of the current global order: national sovereignty, and human rights. As long as countries have sovereign rights to seal their borders the world will not be able to protect the human right of the 200 millionTo 1.2 BillionClimate-change refugees are expected to be created within their borders and elsewhere by 2050. It is possible that nations might agree to give a small amount of their sovereignty to a global government to deal with climate change.
To meet the extraordinary mid-century challenges to come, a supranational body like the UN would need sovereign authority over at least three significant priorities—emission controls, refugee resettlement, and environmental reconstruction. First, a reformated UN would need to have the power of compel nations not to emit more carbon dioxide if the transition towards renewable energy is not complete by 2050. A UN high commissioner to refugees with authority would be empowered to override national sovereignty by requiring northern countries to handle the tidal flow of humanity from the most affected and made least habitable by climate change. The voluntary transfer of funds such as the $100 billion promised poor nations at the 2015 Paris Climate Conference would have to become mandatory to keep afflicted communities, and especially the world’s poor, relatively safe.
These initiatives will change the definition of what constitutes a global order, shifting it from the fragmented imperial ethos of five centuries ago to a new form for global governance in the coming crisis. The UN needs to make long-overdue reforms in order to exercise effective sovereignty over global commons. Instead of superpower power being the ultimate guarantor to UN decisions, a democratically elected Security Council would reach climate decisions through majority vote and enforce them through moral authority and the self-interest of a greater international body.
If a UN of such type were to exist by at least 2050 then a global decentralized energy system could be added to this framework of democratic world government. Since five centuries, energy and imperial power have been deeply intertwined. However, in the transition to alternative energy, households will soon be able control their solar power wherever the sun shines. Communities will not be able. SupplementThis variable source is a mixture of wind turbines and biomass, hydro, and mini reactors.
Just as the demands of petroleum production shaped the steep hierarchy of Washington’s world order, so decentralized access to energy could foster a more inclusive global governance. After five centuries of Iberian, British, American, and Chinese hegemony, it’s at least possible that humanity, even under the increasingly stressful conditions of climate change, could finally experience a more democratic world order.
The question is: How can we get from here? As in the past, civil society is crucial to these changes. Social reformers have been fighting against powerful empires over the past five centuries to promote the principle of Human Rights. The Dominican friars, who were then the embodiments of civil society, pressured the Spanish empire in the 16th century to recognize the humanity and end slavery of Amerindians. Similar efforts were made by activists in the mid-twentieth Century to lobby diplomats who drafted the UN charter, which was transformed from an exclusive imperial club into an open organization.
Just as reformers reduced the harshness and imperial hegemony of the British, Spanish, American, and British empires, so civil society will be crucial in helping to put in place the limitations on national sovereignty that the UN needs to manage our fragile world. The key to this change will be the growing environmental movement, which will in the future expand its agenda beyond reducing and caping emissions to putting pressure on powers, including a more devastated China, to reform the structure of global governance.
A planet ever more battered by climate change, one in which neither an American nor a Chinese “century” will have any meaning, will certainly need a newly empowered world order that can supersede national sovereignty to protect the most fundamental and transcendent of all human rights: survival. The environmental changes that are coming at us are so significant that any other form of democratic global governance would lead to incessant conflicts and, most likely, disaster of an almost unimaginable nature. And no surprise there, since we’ll be dealing with a planet all too literally on the brink.
[ad_2]
