Now Reading
EPA Prepares to Approve Bee-Killing Pesticides for 15 More Years – Mother Jones

EPA Prepares to Approve Bee-Killing Pesticides for 15 More Years – Mother Jones

EPA Prepares to Approve Bee-Killing Pesticides for 15 More Years – Mother Jones

Preston Keres/ Zuma.

This story was first published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

The US Environmental The Protection Agency will allow four of the most destructive chemicals to bees, butterflies, and other insects to continue to America for the next fifteen years, despite European Union moves to ban the use.

The EPA is widely expected to confirm a proposed plan outlined last year that will extend the use of imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin and dinotefuran on US farmland for the next 15 years, even though the agency has noted “ecological risks of concern, particularly to pollinators and aquatic invertebrates.”

These four insecticides are all forms of neonicotinoids. This class of chemicals is used on crops to control pests, but has been shown to cause destruction among non-target insects like bees. The chemicals assault receptors in an insect’s nerve synapses, causing uncontrollable shaking, paralysis, and death.

Neonicotinoids are Use it across150 million acres of American cropsland, approximately the size of Texas, have contributed to the land. Being 48 times more toxic than it was a quarter of a century ago. The chemicals are water-soluble and quickly leach from plants into soils or streams. This has such a negative impact on wildlife that Canada has banned it. Restricted their use while the EU Has been banned the outdoor deployment of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam.

New Jersey and Connecticut have already enacted restrictions on neonicotinoids. The US government will now bow to the pressure of pesticide producers and farmers to continue their use. “We are already seeing crashes in insect numbers and we don’t have another 15 years to waste,” said Nathan Donley, environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “It’s frustrating to see the EPA go down this path. We really are at a crossroads—we can follow the science and the rest of the world or we can go out on our own and appease the chemical industry.”

An EPA spokeswoman said that review decisions for the neonicotinoids will be issued in “late 2022” and that mitigation rules for their use are being considered. “We understand the importance of pollinators for healthy ecosystems and a sustainable food supply,” she said, adding that the EPA “is working aggressively to protect pollinators, including bees.”

A ban on the US is unlikely, however, in the same way as the EU. “While the agency reviews the regulatory efforts of the EU, EPA also looks at regulation in countries such as Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and others that share our risk-based approach to regulation,” said the spokeswoman. “The differences in the details of our underlying laws can naturally lead to different regulatory conclusions.”

Since the 1990s, neonicotinoids have seen a boom in their use, which is regarded by industry as a key to maximizing crop yields. The chemicals can be applied directly to fruits and vegetables, but most often they are embedded in the corn and soybean seeds coated by Syngenta and Bayer.

However, only a small percentage of the insecticide remains within the growing plant. It instead seeps into pollen, water and soils where it is exposed. Researchers have Found that the cognitive functions of bees are scrambled by the chemicals, making them unable to find their way to their hives, while affected beetles stagger around as if drunk.

Studies show that birds can also be affected by neonicotinoids. Have been shownWhile their benefits may be questionable, crop yields are a good example. In many cases, the situation is not improved by the indiscriminate use of the chemicals.

“These insecticides are not helping the productivity of crops on fields—it seems an amazing effort to blanket all these acres with something that doesn’t have a return on investment,” said John Tooker, an entomologist at Penn State University. “These seeds are marketed so well to farmers that they become scared they will have a catastrophic outbreak of pests if they don’t use them, even though this is unlikely. It has contributed to this toxic landscape across the country.”

As well as habitat loss and climate changes, pesticides have been identified as the primary causes of insect declines. The USA as well as Numerous European Countries. It is estimated that the global insect population is on the decline By as muchAs little as 2 percent per annum, with the United Nations warning of half a billion species possible extinction in the next century.

See Also
Speth with President Jimmy Carter in the Oval Office in 1978 discussing a Council on Environmental Quality report on global environmental issues.

Tooker said that neonicotinoids, if used judiciously, can be useful but that their ubiquity has contributed to insects’ woes. “It’s difficult to dismiss the increasing toxicity in the landscape and think it’s doing nothing to insect populations,” he said. “These are the most powerful insecticides ever produced. We are just making insects’ lives harder in every possible way.”

Environmental groups, however, have launched a legal effort to force the EPA to regulate neonicotinoid-coated seeds and have urged the agency to reduce the number of “emergency” permits issued to states that request the spraying of the chemicals beyond what is normally allowed without a full review process.

The EPA Is it worth considering?Florida farmers are allowed to spray clothianidin across 125,000 acres of citrus crops including oranges, grapefruits, lemon. This would be the ninth consecutive emergency request.

“It defies all logic to say an emergency has been going on for nine years, the process has been clearly abused,” Donley said. “The science is so conclusive that these chemicals are harmful to the environment that this emergency exemption process is being used as a backdoor approval that goes on forever.”

“We need an administration that is willing to think about reform and challenge the status quo and we haven’t seen that with the Biden administration,” he adds. “It is certainly better than Trump but there is a lot of disappointment at the lost opportunity for change.”

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.