Now Reading
Nearly 200 Democrats support EPA in Supreme Court’s emissions case
[vc_row thb_full_width=”true” thb_row_padding=”true” thb_column_padding=”true” css=”.vc_custom_1608290870297{background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][thb_postcarousel style=”style3″ navigation=”true” infinite=”” source=”size:6|post_type:post”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Nearly 200 Democrats support EPA in Supreme Court’s emissions case

Nearly 200 Democrats back EPA in Supreme Court emissions case

Nearly 200 Democrats support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) broad authority in regulating planet-warming emissions. This is according to a Supreme Court case that examines what tools the Environmental Protection Agency could use in this endeavor.

There are total of 192 Democratic lawmakers, which includes 29 senators and 163 House Members. Signed onto an amicus briefingSupport the agency.

They claim that a specific section of Clean Air Act (CAA), was “intended”.It is intended to grant broad authority to the EPA to regulate new and existing pollutants.Their filing stated that the CAA was intended for the stated purpose.

On the other hand, West Virginia is a Republican-led state. I have arguedThe provisionEPA does not have the authority to end the power industry.

Sen. Tom CarperThomas (Tom), Richard CarperBiden comments boost spending bill’s climate measures Democrats hope that Biden’s agenda on Manchin’s terms can be saved Democrats call for Biden administration to allow at-risk Afghans to enter the USA more easily (Del.) Who chairs the chambersEnvironment and Public Works Committee, along with Reps. Frank Pallone Jr. Kathy CastorKatherine (Kathy), Anne CastorFlorida Democrats urge DeSantis accept federal aid to expand COVID-19 test Hillicon Valley Dems press privacy group over children’s safety Castor, Schakowsky search for information on children’s online safety programs MORE(Fla.), who are the Chairs of the Houses Energy and Commerce and Select Climate Crisis comms, respectively.

The Supreme Court was inaugurated in October I agreed to accept a case looking atWhether the agency has the ability to decide on matters of great economic and political importance, such as whether or not the country should restructure its energy system.

As the agency is expected implement new regulations regarding power plants, a ruling from the Supreme Court against it may limit the tools at its disposal.

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.