Welcome to Thursdays Overnight Energy & Environment,The latest news and information on energy, environment, and everything in between. Subscribe here thehill.com/newsletter-signup.
Today we are looking at a federal court reversed a Trump-era move that removed protections for graywolves. Joe Manchin
Joe ManchinSanders urges Democrats to bring up the drug pricing bill in Senate Climate will be Biden’s legacy Biden meets utility executives to push for spending agenda(D.W.Va.), keeping climate actions on the table in an interview and the Biden administrations recent move in its push towards an electric vehicle charging system.
Rachel Frazin and Zack Budryk were the Hill’s editors. Send us your tips: [email protected]And [email protected]. Follow us on Twitter: @RachelFrazinAnd @BudrykZack.
Lets jump in.
Trump’s Trump-era gray wolf protections are restored by a court
A federal court in California has restored endangered species protections to the gray wolf, which were lost during the Trump administration.
George W. Bush appointee Judge Jeffrey White ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not adequately consider threats to wolves other than two major populations.
White also stated reasons why he was rejecting Trump’s Trump-era move. He said that a decision to combine West Coast wolves and Northern Rocky Mountain was arbitrary, capricious, and that it was not fair to do so.
Trump administration in 2020 removed endangered species protections that were in place for wolves for more than forty-five years. They claimed they had exceeded recovery targets.
Many animal and environmental advocacy groups disagreed and said they still needed protections.
Last February, the Biden administration defended its predecessor’s decision by claiming that it was based on the best scientific data and commercial data.
It later indicated that it might reverse its decision, stating in September that it would review the status of the endangered species status of the wolf.
It is not clear if the Biden administration will appeal Thursday’s ruling. Vanessa Kauffman, spokesperson for Fish and Wildlife Service, said via email that they are currently reviewing the decision.
Thursday’s ruling does NOT apply to wolves living in Montana or Idaho, where they were already on the delisting list prior to Trump’s actions.
Learn more about the court’s decision here.
CLIMATE ACTION KEEPS MANCHIN ON THE TABLE
He has stated that the Build Back better bill represents President Biden
Joe BidenBillie Eilish meets Biden in the White House Marjorie Taylor Greene is roasted for a ‘gazpachopoli’ comment Biden discusses security and energy with Saudi King SalmanSen. Joe Manchin (D.W.Va.), despite the fact that the spending and climate agendas are dead, maintained climate action in a new interview.
In Interview with a local newspaperHe said that he wanted a tax law that would put us on the path to financial stability.
He stated that he would like a 25% corporate tax rate.
He later said that he was open for taking on climate change at a later time in the interview but did not appear to give specifics.
I am willing to do many good things about climate. We can all come together, we just have to not let caution get in the way.
Biden seeks equity for EV network push
As it prepares for disbursement of funds to states in order to build out an electric vehicle charging system, the Biden administration has issued new guidance. It asks them to do this with equity in mind.
According to Thursday’s guidance document, state plans submitted to federal government for funding the charging network must explain how the State will deliver the projects. [that]Target at least 40% of the benefits to disadvantaged communities
This would allow them to align with Justice40, a White House Initiative that seeks to provide at least 40% of the benefits of federal investments into climate and clean energy to disadvantaged areas.
The report states that the equity push does NOT necessarily mean that 40 per cent of the chargers should be located within disadvantaged communities, if they can still benefit from it in other ways.
This guidance is part of the bipartisan infrastructure bill, which the Biden administration has proclaimed as its signature Build Back better climate and spending bill.
Wednesday’s rollout deal with the bills $5 billion program to allow states to set up a national electric vehicle charging network. The program will provide funds for five years and be distributed to the states.
Learn more about the push by clicking here
REPUBLICANS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT BIDEN SIENCE ADVISER
House Republicans have written a letter raising concerns about a top White House climate adviser after a paper she had edited was retracted last summer.
Reps. Frank Lucas
Frank Dean LucasHouse Republicans blast Democrats’ China Competition Bill Providing affordable housing for our next generation of volunteer firefighters Republicans are divided about how to push vaccines MORE(Okla.), Stephanie Bice and Jay Obernolte ask President Biden whether Dr. [Jane]Public confidence in future policy decisions is undermined by Lubchenco’s leadership role in the administration’s scientific integrity efforts.
We encourage you to think about whether Dr. Lubchenco should be allowed to continue to participate in the development of a framework to improve agency scientific integrity policies, and practices. If the executive branch is unable or unwilling to uphold scientific integrity practices, Congress will need to take a greater role in overseeing these matters.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Editor-in-Chief MayBerenbaum stated in the RetractionLubchenco published a related paper recently with the article authors and has a personal relation with one of them, both of whom are disallowed under the PNAS editorial policy.
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy declined to comment on the Republican Letter.
Instead, it directed The Hill towards a prior statement by an official, which stated that Jane agreed there was a problem and the paper should not be retracted. It also said that Jane told OSTP that it was a matter public record at the time. This was referring to January, when The Scientific Integrity Task Force report was published.
WHAT WAS READING
This is it for today. Thanks for reading. Check out The HillsEnergy & Environment PageStay up-to-date with the latest news and coverage We’ll see you Friday.
