Now Reading
The fate of climate change bills is an early test for the CA Legislature

The fate of climate change bills is an early test for the CA Legislature

OPINION & COMMENTARY

Editorials, and other Opinion content, offer perspectives on issues that are important to our community. They are not dependent on the work of our reporters in the newsroom.

A truck drives past pump jacks operating at the Inglewood Oil Field Thursday, June 10, 2021, in Los Angeles.

A truck drives by pump jacks at Inglewood Oil Field, Thursday, June 10, 2021 in Los Angeles.

AP

The Legislature’s bills on corporate carbon emissions, air quality regulation, and other climate-related issues will show whether it and its current leadership are prepared to act quickly to address climate change in this year’s session. Their handling of these bills will be a sign that Democratic legislators have the fortitude to prioritize climate action over financial calculations and influential trade groups that oppose it.

Senate Bill 260 Senate Bill 342Legislators from the Democratic Party, which is supposedly climate-conscious and science-based, continue to ambivalence proposals that were rejected last year. State senators will be again guilty of the same dereliction of duty that killed dozens of people if neither of these proposals gets enough votes this week. Sensible climate change legislationThese numbers have increased over the past few decades.

SB 260, also known as the Climate Corporate Accountability Act (or Climate Corporate Accountability Act), would require corporations with more than $1 billion in revenue to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions. San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener’s bill would arm state regulators with the data to ensure California’s biggest companies are reducing emissions to meet the state’s clean energy goals.

California has good reasons to be the leader on this front. California-based Chevron, with a revenue of almost $95B last year, is the leader. Largest polluter owned by an investoron the planet. Chevron trailed only Apple and Alphabet, Google’s parent company, among California’s largest publicly traded companies last year. A 2017 study found that 100 companies accounted for more than 70% of the world’s carbon emissions.

Senator Lena Gonzalez, Long Beach, authored SB 342, which would allow the state of California to add two people who reside and work in Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, or San Bernardino counties to the South Coast Air Quality Management District board of 13 members. The goal of the bill is to include an environmental justice perspective on a board that regulates quality air. One of the most polluted parts of the countryIt has been Be consumed by partisan politics.

It’s not surprising that the influential State Building and Construction Trades Council of California opposes the bill. This has caused moderate Democrats to turn their backs to an equity-minded proposition that could help neglected Southern Californian communities breathe cleaner air.

Toni Atkins, Senate Pro Tem Toni Atkins has the responsibility. Mike McGuire is the new Majority LeaderSonoma County to take the initiative on both bills and to get the votes needed to send them to the Assembly. Atkins’ inaction in her final year of service as Senate leader could be a sign that the Senate has become a graveyard for climate legislation.

While neither bill represents a dramatic turn in California’s handling of the climate crisis, both are meaningful and needed. Private corporations have a significant role to play in reducing carbon emissions, and expanding the South Coast’s air quality board empowers citizens to bypass unjust political games and improve the health of their communities.

See Also
Women’s rights are essential for any country to thrive, and could spur a solution multiplier across all sectors (AFP via Getty Images)

California cannot accept the indifference of Senator Democrats like Atkins on climate policy. These bills will decide whether the climate promises made recently are true or just more fuel for future fires.

BEHIND OUR PRESENTATIONS

Who writes editorials?

Editorials are the collective opinion and opinions of The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board. They do not reflect individual opinions of board members or the views of Bee journalists in the news section. Bee reporters do not take part in editorial board deliberations and are not permitted to weigh in on board decisions.

The board comprises Bee Executive Editor Colleen McNamara Nelson, McClatchy California Editor Marcos Breton and Deputy Opinion editor Josh Gohlke. Jack Ohman, Senior Associate Editor, editorial cartoonist Jack Ohman, Assistant Editor Yousef Baig and Robin Epley are also members of the board. Hannah Holzer is an opinion assistant.

Our opinions are based on news reporting by colleagues in the news section as well as our own reporting and interviews. Our members participate in public meetings, call people, and follow up on stories from readers as news reporters. We are not objective reporters. Instead, we share our judgments, and state clearly what we believe should happen based upon our knowledge.

Click the arrow in upper right to continue reading.

Let us know what you think

You may not agree with our view. We believe that disagreements are healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you are interested in sharing your opinions on important events in the Sacramento region, write a letter (150 words or less).This form can be usedEmail an op ed (650-750 word) to opinion@sacbee.com. We are unable to publish all submissions due to the high volume.

Support the Sacramento Bee

These conversations are important to our community. Keep the conversation going with support for The Sacramento Bee Register here.

This story was originally published in January 25, 2022, 5:00 AM

Similar stories from Sacramento Bee



View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.