Now Reading
US officials reverse their position on malathion’s harmful effects to wildlife and announce that pesticide labels will be changed
[vc_row thb_full_width=”true” thb_row_padding=”true” thb_column_padding=”true” css=”.vc_custom_1608290870297{background-color: #ffffff !important;}”][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][thb_postcarousel style=”style3″ navigation=”true” infinite=”” source=”size:6|post_type:post”][vc_empty_space height=”20px”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

US officials reverse their position on malathion’s harmful effects to wildlife and announce that pesticide labels will be changed

BILLINGS, Mont. After receiving promises from chemical companies that they would change the labels of malathion products so that gardeners, farmers, and other consumers can use it more responsibly, U.S. wildlife officials reversed previous findings that a highly toxic pesticide was widely used.

In response to long-standing concerns that malathion, a pesticide used on insects such as grasshoppers and mosquitoes can also cause the death of rare plants and animals, federal rules regarding malathion have been reviewed. A draft finding from U.S. A draft finding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2011. Malathion could threaten 78 endangered species with extinction and cause less harm to many others.

According to documents reviewed by The Associated Press, wildlife officials changed their position on the 78 species following talks between malathion manufacturers and officials from the Wildlife Service and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Officials from the wildlife service now believe malathion may cause some harm to hundreds of species but it is unlikely to threaten their survival as long as the labels that regulate its use are updated. Their conclusion is dependent on gardeners, farmers, and other consumers adhering to the instructions for where and when to apply the pesticide.

Environmentalists who wanted to restrict malathion used said that the proposed label changes would not do much to protect species that, in some cases, have been reduced to very few individuals. They objected to an 18-month time frame for the EPA’s implementation of the guidelines.

This is a big gamble, said Brett Hartl from the Center for Biological Diversity. This biological opinion will not see any changes on the ground for endangered species for at least 18 months, but most likely never.

The manufacturers agreed to use labels with detailed guidelines that outline when and where malathion should only be used to protect wildlife. Labels would tell you not to spray malathion during the middle hours of the day to kill mosquitoes. This is when bees and other insects are most active and thus more likely be killed accidentally.

Gary Frazer is the wildlife services assistant director of ecological services and stated that the measures would reduce many of the harmful effects of malathion.

According to the wildlife agency, FMC Corp. was the main representative of the manufacturers. It is a Philadelphia-based agricultural chemicals company. Lars Weborg, spokesperson for FMC Corp., stated that the proposed labels and other updates on malathion guidelines were created using a standard process common to all industries.

He said that the company couldn’t speculate if malathion would be used less.

Last year, endangered species included birds like the Mississippi sandhill crane, as well as various fish, insects, snails, and other animals and plants.

Keep up with Tampa Bays top headlines

Keep up with Tampa Bay’s top headlines

Get our DayStarter newsletter for free

Every weekday morning, Well delivers the latest news and information.

Raul Grijalva, Chairman of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee, criticized the Biden administration’s inability to take stronger steps to protect endangered species against pesticides. Arizona Democrat Raul Grijalva stated that theoretical restrictions on the use malathion would not be helpful.

Grijalva stated that we must stop using malathion as quickly as possible.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, almost a million pounds per year of malathion is used on crops in California and Florida, Washington, Oregon Oregon, Ohio, and other states. According to data from a 2018 survey, nearly 2 million pounds of malathion is used annually in home gardens. This is for mosquito control and many other uses. According to the data, farmland usage has declined by approximately two-thirds in comparison to 1998’s peak.

Malathion is highly toxic to fish, insects, and crustaceans. International health officials have confirmed that the chemical is likely to cause cancer in humans.

The EPA stated that it would provide online information for pesticide users, including no spray zones in critical wildlife habitat areas. These guidelines are often only guidelines. According to government documents, this includes spraying for mosquito control wherever possible to protect species such as the Houston toad or the Miami tigerbeetle.

Officials said that the fish and wildlife service analysis is the first nationwide review of a EPA-regulated pesticide up for reapproval. In a statement, EPA stated that the measures would help protect endangered species as well as reduce pesticide exposure in other plants and animals.

A legal agreement with Center for Biological Diversity allowed for the review of malathions’ impacts on wildlife. The environmental group sued EPA two decades back for failing to consult with federal agencies regarding the risks of pesticides to wildlife and plants. More lawsuits followed up to the 2013 settlement with Fish and Wildlife Service.

The AP reported that Dow Chemical pushed for the Trump administration’s disregard of government studies on a pesticide family that included malathion in 2017. After initial findings by the EPA that pesticides had adverse effects on more than 1000 endangered and threatened species, the lobbying began.

Later that year, the Trump administration requested a two-year delay in its review on malathion as well as other pesticides.

The National Marine Fisheries Service is currently completing a separate review on malathion’s effect. In a draft analysis dated February 25, the agency indicated that malathion could harm 37 species. The draft did not take into account any label changes proposed by manufacturers, which fisheries officials stated they would include in their final opinion.

MATTHEW BROWN, Associated Press

View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.